Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 23:11:574.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-574.

iGTP: a software package for large-scale gene tree parsimony analysis

Affiliations

iGTP: a software package for large-scale gene tree parsimony analysis

Ruchi Chaudhary et al. BMC Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Background: The ever-increasing wealth of genomic sequence information provides an unprecedented opportunity for large-scale phylogenetic analysis. However, species phylogeny inference is obfuscated by incongruence among gene trees due to evolutionary events such as gene duplication and loss, incomplete lineage sorting (deep coalescence), and horizontal gene transfer. Gene tree parsimony (GTP) addresses this issue by seeking a species tree that requires the minimum number of evolutionary events to reconcile a given set of incongruent gene trees. Despite its promise, the use of gene tree parsimony has been limited by the fact that existing software is either not fast enough to tackle large data sets or is restricted in the range of evolutionary events it can handle.

Results: We introduce iGTP, a platform-independent software program that implements state-of-the-art algorithms that greatly speed up species tree inference under the duplication, duplication-loss, and deep coalescence reconciliation costs. iGTP significantly extends and improves the functionality and performance of existing gene tree parsimony software and offers advanced features such as building effective initial trees using stepwise leaf addition and the ability to have unrooted gene trees in the input. Moreover, iGTP provides a user-friendly graphical interface with integrated tree visualization software to facilitate analysis of the results.

Conclusions: iGTP enables, for the first time, gene tree parsimony analyses of thousands of genes from hundreds of taxa using the duplication, duplication-loss, and deep coalescence reconciliation costs, all from within a convenient graphical user interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
main.png - Tree search in iGTP 1.1. A sample execution of iGTP showing the input gene tree, output folder, and output file statistics windows. Also shown is a Paloverde window displaying a generated species tree.
Figure 2
Figure 2
arch1.png - Architecture Diagram of iGTP 1.1. The rectangular box (labeled iGTP on the top-left corner) represents the user layer of iGTP. Inside this, the application layer services and output tables are shown by cyan and white boxes, respectively. The inputs are at the left and the outputs are at the right. The arrows indicate possible execution sequence.
Figure 3
Figure 3
execution.png - Sample execution of iGTP 1.1. (a) iGTP displaying the statistics table for the selected input gene tree file. (b) After the tree search finishes, an output folder statistics table appears.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2005;6(5):361–375. doi: 10.1038/nrg1603. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snel B, Huynen MA, Dutilh BE. Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2005;59:191–209. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daubin V, Gouy M, Perrière G. A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Research. 2002;12(7):1080–1090. doi: 10.1101/gr.187002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salamin N, Hodkinson TR, Savolainen V. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae) Systematic Biology. 2002;51:136–150. doi: 10.1080/106351502753475916. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Philip GK, Creevey CJ, McInerney JO. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2005;22(5):1175–1184. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi102. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types