Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 4;1(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-1-10.

An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing

Affiliations

An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing

A Cecile Jw Janssens et al. Investig Genet. .

Abstract

Personal genome testing is offered via the internet directly to consumers. Most tests that are currently offered use data from genome-wide scans to predict risks for multiple common diseases and traits. The utility of these tests is limited, predominantly because they lack predictive ability and clear benefits for disease prevention that are specific for genetic risk groups. In the near future, personal genome tests will likely be based on whole genome sequencing, but will these technological advances increase the utility of personal genome testing? Whole genome sequencing theoretically provides information about the risks of both monogenic and complex diseases, but the practical utility remains to be demonstrated. The utility of testing depends on the predictive ability of the test, the likelihood of actionable test results, and the options available for the reduction of risks. For monogenic diseases, the likelihood of known mutations will be extremely low in the general population and it will be a challenge to recognize new causal variants among all rare variants that are found using sequencing. For complex diseases, the predictive ability of genetic tests will be mainly restricted by the heritability of the disease, but also by the genetic complexity of the disease etiology, which determines the extent to which the heritability can be understood. Given that numerous genetic and non-genetic risk factors interact in the causation of complex diseases, the predictive ability of genetic models will likely remain modest. Personal genome testing will have minimal benefits for individual consumers unless major breakthroughs are made in the near future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between the proportion of variance explained by genetic factors and the maximum discriminative accuracy of genetic testing. The discriminative accuracy, assessed as the Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC), is the extent to which predicted risks can discriminate between individuals who will develop the disease of interest and those who will not. The AUC is the probability that the test correctly identifies the person who will develop the disease from a pair of whom one will be affected and one will remain unaffected, and ranges from 0.5 (total lack of discrimination) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination). The numbers next to the smoothed lines refer to the risk of disease in the population. Reprinted with permission from ref 7 (Copyright 2006, Wolters Kluwer Health).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the heritability, genetic complexity and predictive ability of personal genome testing.

References

    1. Mihaescu R, van Hoek M, Sijbrands EJ, Uitterlinden AG, Witteman JC, Hofman A, van Duijn CM, Janssens AC. Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans. Genet Med. 2009;11:588–94. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b13a4f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patch C, Sequeiros J, Cornel MC. Direct to consumer genetic tests. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1111. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.66. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish? N Engl J Med. 2008;358:105–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0708162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Ommen GB, Cornel MC. Recreational genomics? Dreams and fears on genetic susceptibility screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16:403–4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.32. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamburg MA, Collins FS. The Path to Personalized Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:301–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources