Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;117(1):34-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

Neural responses to meaningless pseudosigns: evidence for sign-based phonetic processing in superior temporal cortex

Affiliations

Neural responses to meaningless pseudosigns: evidence for sign-based phonetic processing in superior temporal cortex

Karen Emmorey et al. Brain Lang. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

To identify neural regions that automatically respond to linguistically structured, but meaningless manual gestures, 14 deaf native users of American Sign Language (ASL) and 14 hearing non-signers passively viewed pseudosigns (possible but non-existent ASL signs) and non-iconic ASL signs, in addition to a fixation baseline. For the contrast between pseudosigns and baseline, greater activation was observed in left posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS), but not in left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45), for deaf signers compared to hearing non-signers, based on VOI analyses. We hypothesize that left STS is more engaged for signers because this region becomes tuned to human body movements that conform the phonological constraints of sign language. For deaf signers, the contrast between pseudosigns and known ASL signs revealed increased activation for pseudosigns in left posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) and in left inferior frontal cortex, but no regions were found to be more engaged for known signs than for pseudosigns. This contrast revealed no significant differences in activation for hearing non-signers. We hypothesize that left STG is involved in recognizing linguistic phonetic units within a dynamic visual or auditory signal, such that less familiar structural combinations produce increased neural activation in this region for both pseudosigns and pseudowords.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A) Illustration of the VOI analysis showing greater activation in left STS for deaf signers compared to hearing non-signers for the contrast pseudosigns minus fixation baseline (peak coordinates: −57, −30, −3). The statistical map was rendered on a single subject T1 image in MNI space using MRIcron. B) Illustration of brain regions that were more active for pseudosigns than ASL signs for the deaf participants. The statistical map is from a one sample t test of pseudosigns minus ASL signs and was rendered on a single subject T1 image in MNI space using MRIcron.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker SA, Isardi WJ, Golinkoff RM, Petitto LA. The perception of handshapes in American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition. 2005;33(5):887–904. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baus C, Gutiérrez-Sigut E, Quer J, Carreiras M. Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production. Cognition. 2008;108(3):856–865. - PubMed
    1. Brentari D. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. The MIT Press; 1998.
    1. Buchsbaum BR, Olsen RK, Koch P, Berman KF. Human dorsal and ventral auditory streams subserve rehearsal-based and echoic processes during verbal working memory. Neuron. 2005;48:687–697. - PubMed
    1. Buchsbaum B, Pickell B, Love T, Hatrak M, Bellugi U, Hickok G. Neural substrates for verbal working memory in deaf signers: fMRI study and lesion case report. Brain and Language. 2005;95:265–272. - PubMed

Publication types