Contextual profiles of young adult ecstasy users: A multisite study
- PMID: 21094585
- PMCID: PMC3053125
- DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.10.004
Contextual profiles of young adult ecstasy users: A multisite study
Abstract
These analyses assess contextual profiles of 612 young adult ecstasy users, 18-30 years of age, from St. Louis (USA), Miami (USA) and Sydney (Australia). Bivariate analyses revealed different contextual factors influencing ecstasy use. Friends were the most common sources of ecstasy at all sites and most used with friends. St. Louis and Miami use mostly occurred in residences, whereas in Sydney use was mostly at clubs, bars or restaurants. Ecstasy consumption at public places and in cars, trains or ferries was significantly higher in Miami (89% and 77%) than in St. Louis (67% and 65%) and Sydney (67% and 61%). At all sites, simultaneous use of LSD/mushroom and nitrous oxide with ecstasy was common; concurrent amphetamines predominated in Sydney and heroin/opiates in St. Louis Contextual factors influencing ecstasy use among young adults vary by geographic region. Their inclusion may help tailor effective prevention programs to reduce or ameliorate ecstasy use.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Tri-city study of Ecstasy use problems: a latent class analysis.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Dec 1;98(3):249-63. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Jul 31. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008. PMID: 18674872 Free PMC article.
-
The external validity of results derived from ecstasy users recruited using purposive sampling strategies.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Jan 7;73(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.09.001. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004. PMID: 14687957
-
Modifiable risk factors of ecstasy use: risk perception, current dependence, perceived control, and depression.Addict Behav. 2010 Mar;35(3):201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 18. Addict Behav. 2010. PMID: 19880258 Free PMC article.
-
MDMA and the "ecstasy paradigm".J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014 Jan-Mar;46(1):44-56. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2014.878148. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014. PMID: 24830185 Review.
-
MDMA in humans: factors which affect the neuropsychobiological profiles of recreational ecstasy users, the integrative role of bioenergetic stress.J Psychopharmacol. 2006 Mar;20(2):147-63. doi: 10.1177/0269881106063268. J Psychopharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16510474 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of disapproval toward "hard drug" use among high school seniors in the US.Prev Sci. 2014 Oct;15(5):725-35. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0436-0. Prev Sci. 2014. PMID: 24101213 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abdallah AB, Scheier LM, Inciardi JA, Copeland J, Cottler LB. A psycho-economic model of ecstasy consumption and related consequences: a multi-site study with community samples. Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42(11):1651–1684. - PubMed
-
- Abraham M, Kaal H, Cohen P. Licit and Illicit Drug Use in the Netherlands 2001. Amsterdam: CEDRO/Mets en Schilt; 2002.
-
- Arria AM, Yacoubian GS, Jr, Fost E, Wish ED. The pediatric forum: ecstasy use among club rave attendees. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(3):295–296. - PubMed
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: First results. Australian Institute of Health; Canberra: 2002.
-
- Banken JA. Drug abuse trends among youth in the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1025:465–471. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical