Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):97-105.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3644. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

Phase III, randomized study of the effects of parenteral iron, oral iron, or no iron supplementation on the erythropoietic response to darbepoetin alfa for patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase III, randomized study of the effects of parenteral iron, oral iron, or no iron supplementation on the erythropoietic response to darbepoetin alfa for patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia

David P Steensma et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Functional iron deficiency may impair response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in iron-replete patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia (CAA). This study evaluated whether coadministration of parenteral iron improves ESA efficacy in patients with CAA.

Patients and methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial enrolled 502 patients with hemoglobin (Hb) less than 11 g/dL who were undergoing chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies. All patients received darbepoetin alfa once every 3 weeks and were randomly assigned to receive either ferric gluconate 187.5 mg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks, oral daily ferrous sulfate 325 mg, or oral placebo for 16 weeks.

Results: There was no difference in the erythropoietic response rate (ie, proportion of patients achieving Hb ≥ 12 g/dL or Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL from baseline): 69.5% (95% CI, 61.9% to 76.5%) of IV iron-treated patients achieved an erythropoietic response compared with 66.9% (95% CI, 59.1% to 74.0%) who received oral iron and 65.0% (95% CI, 57.2% to 72.3%) who received oral placebo (P = .75). There were also no differences in the proportion of patients requiring red cell transfusions, changes in quality of life, or the dose of darbepoetin administered. Adverse events (AEs) tended to be more common in the IV iron arm: grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 54% (95% CI, 46% to 61%) of patients receiving IV iron compared with 44% (95% CI, 36% to 52%) who received oral iron and 46% (95% CI, 38% to 54%) who received oral placebo (P = .16).

Conclusion: In patients with CAA, addition of IV ferric gluconate to darbepoetin failed to provide additional benefit compared with oral iron or oral placebo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram. DA, darbepoetin alfa; IV, intravenous; pts, patients; Hb, hemoglobin.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Mean hemoglobin (Hb) over the course of the study. Mean Hb week by week for intravenous (IV) iron, oral iron, and oral placebo cohorts. Vertical lines represent error bars.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Mean ferritin over time. Mean ferritin levels at baseline, end of week 6 (just before third dose of intravenous [IV] iron for the IV iron cohort), and end of study (3 weeks after fifth and final dose of IV iron for the IV iron cohort) for IV iron, oral iron, and oral placebo cohorts. Vertical lines represent error bars.

Comment in

References

    1. Spivak JL. The anaemia of cancer: Death by a thousand cuts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:543–555. - PubMed
    1. Bohlius J, Wilson J, Seidenfeld J, et al. Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003407. - PubMed
    1. Goodnough LT. Erythropoietin and iron-restricted erythropoiesis. Exp Hematol. 2007;35:167–172. - PubMed
    1. Bohlius J. Is intravenous iron supplementation with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents beneficial in cancer patients with anemia? Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5:688–689. - PubMed
    1. Auerbach M. Should intravenous iron be the standard of care in oncology? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1579–1581. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms