Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep;22(3):145-51.
doi: 10.1177/1531003510382664.

Long-term follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: is ultrasound alone enough?

Affiliations
Review

Long-term follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: is ultrasound alone enough?

Andrew M Bakken et al. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

In the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the preferred method for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with suitable anatomy. EVAR offers the advantage of lower perioperative morbidity and mortality but carries the cost of device-related complications such as endoleak, graft migration, graft thrombosis, and structural graft failure. These complications mandate a lifelong surveillance of EVAR patients and their endografts. Since the advent of EVAR, this has largely been accomplished with serial computed tomography (CT). There is, however, increasing awareness of the risks and costs of a lifelong CT imaging mandate, which has led to several cohort analyses comparing CT with color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the evaluation of the endograft and aneurysm sac post-EVAR. This review will summarize the findings of these reports and highlight the results of recent ultrasound-based surveillance strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources