Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan;21(1):13-21.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283410117.

Botulinum neurotoxin A for male lower urinary tract symptoms

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Botulinum neurotoxin A for male lower urinary tract symptoms

Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jan.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Curr Opin Urol. 2011 May;21(3):265. Dosage error in article text

Abstract

Purpose of review: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affects a large number of male patients from 45 years onward, increasing with age. Routine medical treatment is mainly limited to plant extracts, α-blockers, and 5-α-reductase inhibitors. Although all types of drug have a proven efficacy, they often do not sufficiently treat all aspects of LUTS related to BPH. Thus, there is a need for alternatives. Intraprostatic injections with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) seem to be a promising alternative. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent findings from basic science and clinical studies in relation to BoNT/A application in BPH-related LUTS, thereby providing insight into the putative mechanism of action, the rationale for the use of BoNT/A in BPH-related LUTS, and the clinical outcomes.

Recent findings: There is some evidence that BoNT/A intraprostatic injections affect both, the static and dynamic component of BPH-related LUTS by reducing the prostate volume and by downregulation of α-1A-adrenoreceptors. Clinical trials demonstrated an easy and minimally invasive intraprostatic application of BoNT/A with a favourable safety profile. Efficacy seems to be good with significant improvements for several months in symptoms, urinary flow rate and reduction in postvoid residual, prostate volume, and also prostate-specific antigen in some studies.

Summary: BoNT/A seems to be a promising alternative in the treatment of BPH-related LUTS with a good tolerance and safety profile. However, the level of evidence is still low and further randomized controlled studies are mandatory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances