Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Mar;31(3):535-9.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181eac724.

Randomized trial of anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial of anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections

Gregory R Blaha et al. Retina. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of four different anesthetic methods for intravitreal injection.

Methods: Twenty-four patients each received four intravitreal injections using each of four types of anesthesia (proparacaine, tetracaine, lidocaine pledget, and subconjunctival injection of lidocaine) in a prospective, masked, randomized block design. Pain was graded by the patient on a 0 to 10 scale for both the anesthesia and the injection.

Results: The average combined pain scores for both the anesthesia and the intravitreal injection were 4.4 for the lidocaine pledget, 3.5 for topical proparacaine, 3.8 for the subconjunctival lidocaine injection, and 4.1 for topical tetracaine. The differences were not significant (P = 0.65). There were also no statistical differences in the individual anesthesia or injection pain scores. Subconjunctival lidocaine injection had the most side effects.

Conclusion: Topical anesthesia is an effective method for limiting pain associated with intravitreal injections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms