Understanding what matters to patients - identifying key patients' perceptions of quality
- PMID: 21103095
- PMCID: PMC2984338
- DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2009.100028
Understanding what matters to patients - identifying key patients' perceptions of quality
Abstract
Objectives: To demonstrate a statistical method to enable the identification of key drivers of quality from a patient perspective that can be used by service providers to help drive improvement.
Design: Cross-tabulation, Chi-square analysis and Cramer's V calculation using SPSS software of NHS Inpatient Surveys 2006 and 2007.
Setting: The NHS Inpatient Survey is a standardized survey designed by the Picker Institute conducted on a sample of patients across all acute care hospital trusts in England.
Participants: The surveys (available from the UK Data Archive) provide anonymized patient data for over 77,000 patients in 2006 and 72,000 patients in 2007.
Main outcome measures: Cramer's V score testing associations between patient ratings on multiple components of care and ratings on the overall quality of care.
Results: Of the 58 questions analysed, some questions correlate more strongly with overall satisfaction of care than others and there is strong agreement of results over the two years. Of the top 20 rated components, communication (both between professionals and between professionals and patients) and trust engendered by that communication is a recurring theme.
Conclusions: Hospital trusts are required to develop quality indicators and collate detailed feedback from patients in addition to the annual inpatient survey to measure these. To make best use of resources, additional data collection should focus on those aspects of care of most importance to patients locally. This analysis demonstrates a statistical technique that can help to identify such priority areas by showing those aspects of care most strongly associated with the overall rating of care. The analysis uses national level data to demonstrate how this can be achieved. This shows the importance to patients of being treated with dignity and respect, and good communication between staff and between staff and patients.
Similar articles
-
Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(19):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GQQV3512. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37921786 Review.
-
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25287521 Free PMC article.
-
Patients admitted to more research-active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: Results from a retrospective cross-sectional study.J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):203-208. doi: 10.1111/jep.13118. Epub 2019 Feb 19. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020. PMID: 30784152
-
Relationship between employee engagement scores and service quality ratings: analysis of the National Health Service staff survey across 97 acute NHS Trusts in England and concurrent Care Quality Commission outcomes (2012-2016).BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 17;9(7):e026472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026472. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31320347 Free PMC article.
-
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 22747798 Review.
Cited by
-
Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1081-92. doi: 10.1111/hex.12081. Epub 2013 May 30. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 23721257 Free PMC article.
-
The National Adult Inpatient Survey conducted in the English National Health Service from 2002 to 2009: how have the data been used and what do we know as a result?BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 21;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-71. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22436670 Free PMC article.
-
Reflection in practice: How can patient experience feedback trigger staff reflection in hospital acute care settings?Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):396-404. doi: 10.1111/hex.13010. Epub 2019 Dec 19. Health Expect. 2020. PMID: 31858677 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 19;21(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06459-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34011321 Free PMC article.
-
What matters to patients? A timely question for value-based care.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0227845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227845. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32644993 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Saddler J The building blocks of quality. Health Serv J 2009;119:15. - PubMed
-
- Department of Health High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report. London: Department of Health; 2008 - PubMed
-
- Cornwell J Exploring how to improve patients' experience in hospital at both national and local levels. Nurs Times 2009;105:12–15 - PubMed
-
- Boyd J The 2006 Inpatients Importance Study. Oxford: Picker Institute; 2007
-
- UK Data Archive. See http://www.data-archive.ac.uk .
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources