Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?
- PMID: 21104269
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1570-z
Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?
Abstract
Background: Theoretically, the accommodative and vergence demands are different between single-vision contact lenses and spectacle lenses. The aim of the present study was to determine whether these differences exist when these two correction methods are used in clinical practice. For this, different visual parameters that characterize the accommodative (accommodation amplitude, accommodative facility, and accommodative response) and binocular function (near and distance horizontal and vertical dissociated phorias, near and vertical associated phorias, near and distance negative and positive fusional vergence, vergence facility, near point of convergence, negative and positive relative accommodation, stimulus AC:A ratio and stereoacuity) were evaluated in a student population when their myopia was corrected with either spectacles or soft contact lenses (SCL).
Methods: All parameters were measured on two separate occasions in 30 myopic habitual contact lens and spectacle wearers of mean age 19 ± 2.4 years. Some parameters such as accommodation amplitude, accommodative response, and stimulus AC:A ratio were measured using two measurement methods which are commonly used in clinical practice. Three measurements were taken for each parameter and averaged. For the comparative statistical analysis, we used the Student's t-test (p value < 0.05).
Results: The following statistically significant differences were found with the use of SCL in comparison to spectacles: higher accommodative lags, higher negative relative accommodation, more esophoric near horizontal dissociated phoria, and lower negative fusional vergence in near vision.
Conclusions: The results found in this study show a definite trend towards poorer accommodative and vergence function with the use of contact lenses in comparison to glasses. This downward trend, though not statistically significant in accommodative function (lower PRA values and less lens amplitude of accommodation) might suggest that temporal insufficiency in the accommodation process could be occurring while contact lenses are used, thereby possibly creating a lag in accommodation to reduce associated overconvergence. This would be manifested in more esophoric values being found in the vergence function. The higher accommodative lags found in this study with SCL could indicate that prolonged use of SCL in near tasks may provoke a continuous hyperopic retinal defocus, a risk factor for the onset and progression of myopia, as indicated in numerous studies.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of binocular vision and accommodation in myopic children wearing defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses for 24 months.J Optom. 2025 Jul-Sep;18(3):100558. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2025.100558. Epub 2025 May 17. J Optom. 2025. PMID: 40382888 Free PMC article.
-
Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers.Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Jun;40(3):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017. PMID: 28215499
-
The Effect of Vertically Yoked Prisms on Binocular Vision and Accommodation.Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Jun;96(6):414-423. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001388. Optom Vis Sci. 2019. PMID: 31107840
-
IMI Accommodation and Binocular Vision in Myopia Development and Progression.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Apr 28;62(5):4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.5.4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021. PMID: 33909034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
'The role of accommodative function in myopic development: A review.'.Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 May 19;37(4):455-461. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.2006724. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34821535 Review.
Cited by
-
Changes in the accommodation-convergence relationship after the Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for myopic patients.Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;28(2):150-4. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.2.150. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24688257 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Binocular and accommodative function in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS).Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;257(1):207-215. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4115-5. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30196481 Clinical Trial.
-
Accommodation and binocular vision changes after wearing orthokeratology lens in 8- to 14-year-old myopic children.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;259(7):2035-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05106-2. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33528648
-
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children exhibit an impaired accommodative response.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;256(5):1023-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3948-2. Epub 2018 Mar 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29569083
-
Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction.BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 4;16(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0352-8. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27716112 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous