Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov 28;16(44):5555-64.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5555.

Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Milan Vosmik et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and surgery represent the main treatment modalities in esophageal cancer. The goal of modern radiotherapy approaches, based on recent technological advances, is to minimize post-treatment complications by improving the gross tumor volume definition (positron emission tomography-based planning), reducing interfraction motion (image-guided radiotherapy) and intrafraction motion (respiratory-gated radiotherapy), and by better dose delivery to the precisely defined planning target volume (intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy). Reduction of radiotherapy-related toxicity is fundamental to the improvement of clinical results in esophageal cancer, although the dose escalation concept is controversial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of 61-year-old man with primary squamous cell carcinoma in distal part of the esophagus T3N0M0 prepared in treatment position for radiotherapy planning. A: Computed tomography (CT), axial slice; B: Positron emission tomography (PET), axial slice; C: PET/CT fusion, axial slice; D: CT, sagital slice; E: PET, sagital slice; F: PET/CT fusion, sagital slice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan prepared on a positron emission tomography/computer tomography dataset (Figure 1). Delineated target volumes and organs at risk, beam arrangement and dose distribution in axial (A), coronal (B), and sagittal slices (C).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Koshy M, Esiashvilli N, Landry JC, Thomas CR Jr, Matthews RH. Multiple management modalities in esophageal cancer: epidemiology, presentation and progression, work-up, and surgical approaches. Oncologist. 2004;9:137–146. - PubMed
    1. Holmes RS, Vaughan TL. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:2–9. - PubMed
    1. Bosetti C, Levi F, Ferlay J, Garavello W, Lucchini F, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Trends in oesophageal cancer incidence and mortality in Europe. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1118–1129. - PubMed
    1. Pera M, Manterola C, Vidal O, Grande L. Epidemiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:151–159. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Version I. 2010. Accessed February 1. 2010. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/esophageal.pdf.

Publication types

MeSH terms