Drug advertising, continuing medical education, and physician prescribing: a historical review and reform proposal
- PMID: 21105944
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00534.x
Drug advertising, continuing medical education, and physician prescribing: a historical review and reform proposal
Abstract
Through the 1960s, many people claimed that drug advertising was educational and physicians often relied on it. Continuing Medical Education (CME) was developed to provide an alternative. However, because CME relied on grants, industry funders chose the subjects offered. Now policymakers worry that drug firms support CME to promote sales and that commercial support biases prescribing and fosters inappropriate drug use. A historical review reveals parallel problems between advertising and industry-funded CME. To preclude industry influence and improve CME, we should ensure independent funding by taxing medical industries, facilities and physicians. Independent public and professional authorities should create CME curricula. An independent agency should allocate all funds to educational institutions for approved curricula.
© 2010 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?CMAJ. 1993 Nov 15;149(10):1401-7. CMAJ. 1993. PMID: 8221424 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventing and Treating Narcotic Addiction--Century of Federal Drug Control.N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2095-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508818. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 26605925 No abstract available.
-
[Conflict of interest in continuing medical education - Studies on certified CME courses].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;110-111:60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 5. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016. PMID: 26875037 German.
-
Pharmaceutical industry financial support for medical education: benefit, or undue influence?J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Fall;37(3):451-60, 396. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00406.x. J Law Med Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19723256
-
Pharmaceutical industry support for continuing medical education programs: a review of current ethical guidelines.Mt Sinai J Med. 1995 Nov;62(6):427-30. Mt Sinai J Med. 1995. PMID: 8692156 Review.
Cited by
-
Seeding trials: Marketing gimmick or credible scientific research.Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Mar;63(3):235-238. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_831_18. Indian J Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 30988540 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Contact between doctors and the pharmaceutical industry, their perceptions, and the effects on prescribing habits.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110130. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25330392 Free PMC article.
-
Is there a doctor in the house? : The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context.J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):105-12. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0062-0. Epub 2011 Sep 6. J Community Genet. 2012. PMID: 22109907 Free PMC article.
-
Mental Health as a Basic Human Right and the Interference of Commercialized Science.Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):61-68. Health Hum Rights. 2020. PMID: 32669789 Free PMC article.
-
The transformation of continuing medical education (CME) in the United States.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013 Sep 19;4:171-82. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S35087. eCollection 2013. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013. PMID: 24101887 Free PMC article. Review.