'Trig-onometry': non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a therapeutic target in dyslipidaemia
- PMID: 21105969
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02547.x
'Trig-onometry': non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a therapeutic target in dyslipidaemia
Abstract
Targeting elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the cornerstone of cardiovascular prevention. However, this fraction does not adequately capture elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs; e.g. intermediate-density lipoprotein, very low density lipoprotein) in certain patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetic dyslipidaemia. Many such individuals have residual cardiovascular risk that might be lipid/lipoprotein related despite therapy with first-line agents (statins). Epidemiological evidence encompassing > 100,000 persons supports the contention that non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is a superior risk factor vs. LDL-C for incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in certain patient populations. In studies with clinical end-points evaluated in the current article, a 1:1 to 1:3 relationship was observed between reductions in non-HDL-C and in the relative risk of CHD after long-term treatment with statins, niacin (nicotinic acid) and fibric-acid derivatives (fibrates); this relationship increased to 1:5 to 1:10 in smaller subgroups of patients with elevated triglycerides and low HDL-C levels. Treatment with statin-, niacin-, fibrate-, ezetimibe-, and omega 3 fatty acid-containing regimens reduced non-HDL-C by approximately 9-65%. In a range of clinical trials, long-term treatment with these agents also significantly decreased the incidence of clinical/angiographic/imaging efficacy outcome variables. For patients with dyslipidaemia, consensus guidelines have established non-HDL-C treatment targets 30 mg/dl higher than LDL-C goals. Ongoing prospective randomised controlled trials should help to resolve controversies concerning (i) the clinical utility of targeting non-HDL-C in patients with dyslipidaemia; (ii) the most efficacious and well-tolerated therapies to reduce non-HDL-C (e.g. combination regimens); and (iii) associations between such reductions and clinical, angiographic, and/or imaging end-points.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Comment in
-
Cardiovascular screening: which populations, what measures of risk?Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Jan;65(1):3-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02566.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21155938 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of modifying triglycerides and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins on cardiovascular outcomes.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;51(4):331-51. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318165e2e7. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18427276 Review.
-
What is the most effective strategy for managing diabetic dyslipidaemia?Atheroscler Suppl. 2005 Sep;6(3):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2005.06.005. Atheroscler Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16054442 Review.
-
Raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with reduction of cardiovascular risk: the role of nicotinic acid--a position paper developed by the European Consensus Panel on HDL-C.Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20(8):1253-68. doi: 10.1185/030079904125004402. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004. PMID: 15324528 Review.
-
What does the future hold for niacin as a treatment for hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease?J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Nov;11(11):858-60. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32833dadc3. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010. PMID: 20686417
-
[Multimodal therapy of dyslipidemia].Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011 May;6:10-6. doi: 10.1007/s11789-011-0031-5. Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011. PMID: 22528173 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of dyslipidemia and lipid goal attainment in statin-treated subjects from 3 data sources: a retrospective analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Dec;1(6):e001800. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.001800. Epub 2012 Dec 19. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012. PMID: 23316314 Free PMC article.
-
Statin prescription strategies and atherogenic cholesterol goals attainment in Lebanese coronary artery disease patients.Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):919-926. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0483-x. Epub 2017 May 18. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017. PMID: 28523462
-
Role of HDL function and LDL atherogenicity on cardiovascular risk: A comprehensive examination.PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218533. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31246976 Free PMC article.
-
Demystifying the management of hypertriglyceridaemia.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Nov;10(11):648-61. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.140. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24060958 Review.
-
Molecular sources of residual cardiovascular risk, clinical signals, and innovative solutions: relationship with subclinical disease, undertreatment, and poor adherence: implications of new evidence upon optimizing cardiovascular patient outcomes.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:617-70. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S37119. Epub 2013 Oct 21. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013. PMID: 24174878 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical