[Influence of compliance on the incidence of cardiovascular events and health costs when using single-pill fixed-dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension]
- PMID: 21106209
- DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.038
[Influence of compliance on the incidence of cardiovascular events and health costs when using single-pill fixed-dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension]
Abstract
Background and objective: To determine the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE) and health care costs in relation to compliance, persistence and level of blood pressure control when comparing patients treated with single-pill combinations (SPC) or free combinations (FC) for the treatment of hypertension.
Patients and methods: Observational, multicenter study that included patients>30 years old, from six primary care teams and two hospitals, who started pharmacological treatment for hypertension during 2006. Two study groups were established: SPC (ACEIs/diuretics; ARBs/diuretics) and FC (ACEIs+DIU; ARB+DIU, separately). Main variables studied were sociodemographic data, comorbidity, Charlson-index, compliance, persistence and achievement of therapeutic goals (ESH-ESC criteria). The cumulative incidence of CVE and a total-cost model were determined (differentiating: health/direct; non-health/indirect). Patients were followed for two years. Statistical analysis included logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards model and analysis of covariance. Statistical signification: p<0.05.
Results: 1,605 patients were recruited, 1,112 (69.3%) receiving SPC and 493 (30.7%) receiving FC, p<0.001; mean age: 69.4 (12.2) years; women: 55.5%. FC treatments were associated with ischaemic heart disease (OR=1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-2.0) and organ failure (OR=1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-2.1), p<0.031. Patients on SPC showed better therapeutic compliance (77.6% vs 71.9%; p<0.001) and longer persistence of treatment (62.1% on-treatment at 24-months [95% CI: 56.3-67.9] vs 49.7% [95% CI: 38.5-60.9]; p<0.001). Optimal control of blood pressure was higher in SPC (48.9% [95% CI: 43.0-54.8] vs 46.7% [95% CI: 35.6-57.8]; p<0.001). Cumulative incidence of cerebrovascular accidents in FC was 4.6% vs 2.4% in SPC; p=0.041. The total health care costs were lower in SPC (1,650.7 € vs 1,674.8 €; p<0.001), including lower specialized care costs (316.1 € vs 382.9 €; p<0.001), fewer hospital admissions and less loss of labour productivity (44.5 € vs 88.4 €; p<0.001).
Conclusions: Better compliance and persistence with antihypertensive fixed-dose combinations improves therapeutic control, leading to a significant reduction of cerebrovascular accidents and total health care costs.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Relationship of polymedication in controlling blood pressure: compliance, persistence, costs and incidence of new cardiovascular events].Med Clin (Barc). 2013 Jul 21;141(2):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.04.026. Epub 2012 Jul 4. Med Clin (Barc). 2013. PMID: 22766057 Spanish.
-
Comparison of real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for newly initiated valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination versus angiotensin receptor blocker/calcium channel blocker free-combination therapy.J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):576-83. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.596873. Epub 2011 Jul 6. J Med Econ. 2011. PMID: 21728914
-
Economic evaluation of single-pill combination of indapamide and amlodipine in the treatment of arterial hypertension in the Polish setting.Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(9):768-80. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0089. Epub 2015 May 19. Kardiol Pol. 2015. PMID: 25987296
-
Single Pill Regimen Leads to Better Adherence and Clinical Outcome in Daily Practice in Patients Suffering from Hypertension and/or Dyslipidemia: Results of a Meta-Analysis.High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Apr;27(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00370-5. Epub 2020 Mar 26. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020. PMID: 32219670 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving treatment adherence to antihypertensive therapy: the role of single-pill combinations.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Feb;13(3):345-55. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.652086. Epub 2012 Jan 6. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012. PMID: 22220825 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of the Potential Clinical and Economic Impact of Weight Loss in the Adult Population with Obesity and Associated Comorbidities in Spain.Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):1265-1282. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03094-3. Epub 2025 Jan 18. Adv Ther. 2025. PMID: 39825974 Free PMC article.
-
Use of single pill combinations in the treatment of arterial hypertension in Poland: The current practice and guidelines, the impact on reimbursement spending and patient co-payment.Cardiol J. 2022;29(3):405-412. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0031. Epub 2022 May 17. Cardiol J. 2022. PMID: 35578761 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in hypertensive patients treated with a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/valsartan.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Jan;17(1):51-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12449. Epub 2014 Dec 5. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015. PMID: 25477188 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Hypertension in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Structured Review.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Mar;24(2):141-170. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00625-1. Epub 2024 Feb 8. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024. PMID: 38332411 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical