Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;58(3):247-55.
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000091.

The multinomial model of prospective memory: validity of ongoing-task parameters

Affiliations

The multinomial model of prospective memory: validity of ongoing-task parameters

Sebastian S Horn et al. Exp Psychol. 2011.

Abstract

The objective of this research was to provide additional experimental validation of the multinomial processing tree (MPT) model of event-based prospective memory (Smith & Bayen, 2004). In particular, the parameters that measure trial-type detection in the ongoing task were examined. In three experiments with different response instructions, event-based prospective memory tasks were embedded in ongoing color-matching tasks. The results support the validity of the MPT model, that is, manipulations of ongoing-task difficulty affected the ongoing-task parameters of the MPT model, while leaving the estimates for the prospective and the retrospective components of prospective memory unaffected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The multinomial processing tree model of event-based prospective memory for three responses. PM = prospective memory; C1 = probability of detecting a color match; C2 = probability of detecting that a color does not match; P = prospective component; M1 = probability of detecting a PM target; M2 = probability of detecting that a word is not a PM target; g = probability of guessing that a word is a target; c = probability of guessing that the color matches. Adapted from “A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory” by R. E. Smith and U. J. Bayen, 2004, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, p. 758. Copyright 2004 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted with permission.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baayen HR, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database [CD ROM] Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania; 1995.
    1. Baddeley AD. Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1986.
    1. Baddeley AD. Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology. 1996;49:5–28.
    1. Batchelder WH, Riefer DM. Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1999;6:57–86. - PubMed
    1. Bisiacchi PS, Schiff S, Ciccola A, Kliegel M. The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: Behavioural data and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:1362–1373. - PubMed

Publication types