Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 23;7(2):312-5.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0996. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios

Affiliations

The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios

Chris Carbone et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Large carnivores are highly threatened, yet the processes underlying their population declines are still poorly understood and widely debated. We explored how body mass and prey abundance influence carnivore density using data on 199 populations obtained across multiple sites for 11 carnivore species. We found that relative decreases in prey abundance resulted in a five- to sixfold greater decrease in the largest carnivores compared with the smallest species. We discuss a number of possible causes for this inherent vulnerability, but also explore a possible mechanistic link between predator size, energetics and population processes. Our results have important implications for carnivore ecology and conservation, demonstrating that larger species are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic threats to their environment, especially those which have an adverse affect on the abundance of their prey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The slope (s) of the predator–prey population responses plotted against log of carnivore mass (log M, in kilograms). Steeper slopes are related to a faster rate of change with changing prey. The best-fit line is s = 0.217 × log M + 0.245 (r2 = 0.79).

References

    1. Cardillo M., Purvis A., Sechrest W., Gittleman J. L., Bielby J., Mace G. M. 2004. Human population density and extinction risk in the world's carnivores. PLoS Biol. 2, e197. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Valkenburgh B., Wang X. M., Damuth J. 2004. Cope's rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American canids. Science 306, 101–10410.1126/science.1102417 (doi:10.1126/science.1102417) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chapron G., Miquelle D. G., Lambert A., Goodrich J. M., Legendre S., Clobert J. 2008. The impact on tigers of poaching versus prey depletion. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1667–167410.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01538.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01538.x) - DOI - DOI
    1. Carbone C., Gittleman J. L. 2002. A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density. Science 295, 2273–227610.1126/science.1067994 (doi:10.1126/science.1067994) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Damuth J. 1987. Interspecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy-use. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 31, 193–24610.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01990.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01990.x) - DOI - DOI

LinkOut - more resources