Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 23;7(3):392-4.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0859. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

Going, going, gone: the impact of white-nose syndrome on the summer activity of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)

Yvonne Dzal  1 , Liam P McGuire, Nina Veselka, M Brock Fenton
Affiliations

Going, going, gone: the impact of white-nose syndrome on the summer activity of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)

Yvonne Dzal et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Since its discovery in the winter of 2005-2006, white-nose syndrome (WNS) has killed over one million little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the American northeast. Although many studies have reported die-offs of bats at winter hibernacula, it is important to understand how bat mortality linked to WNS at winter hibernacula affects bat activity levels in their summer ranges. In the summer (May-August) of 2007, 2008 and 2009, we recorded echolocation calls to determine bat activity at sites along the Hudson River, NY (within approx. 100 km of where WNS was first reported). We documented a 78 per cent decline in the summer activity of M. lucifugus, coinciding with the arrival and spread of WNS. We suggest that mortality of M. lucifugus in winter hibernacula is reflected by reduced levels of activity in the summer and that WNS affects the entire bat population of an area, and not only individual hibernacula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map of the northeastern United States indicating the location of the study area in relation to Howes Cave (filled triangle), where WNS was first reported in the winter of 2005–2006. Filled circles indicate sampling sites along the Hudson River.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summer bat activity during the spread of WNS. Little brown bats (M. lucifugus; filled bars) have been severely affected by WNS while hoary bats (L. cinereus; open bars) have not been affected. Myotis lucifugus activity decreased by 78% from 2008 to 2009, while L. cinereus experienced no precipitous declines. Sample sizes (number of 10 min files analysed) are indicated for each year.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Blehert D. S., et al. 2009. Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Science 323, 227. 10.1126/science.1163874 (doi:10.1126/science.1163874) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meteyer C. U., Buckles E. L., Blehert D. S., Hicks A. C., Green D. E., Shearn-Bochsler V., Thomas N. J., Gargas A., Behr M. J. 2009. Histopathologic criteria to confirm white-nose syndrome in bats. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 21, 411–414 - PubMed
    1. Gargas A., Trest M. T., Christensen M., Volk T. J., Blehert D. S. 2009. Geomyces destructans sp. nov. associated with bat white-nose syndrome. Mycotaxon 108, 147–154
    1. Courtin F., Stone W. B., Risatti G., Gilbert K., Van Kruiningen H. J. 2010. Pathologic findings and liver elements in hibernating bats with white-nose syndrome. Vet. Pathol. 47, 214–219 10.1177/0300985809358614 (doi:10.1177/0300985809358614) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyles J. G., Willis C. K. R. 2009. Could localized warm areas inside cold caves reduce mortality of hibernating bats affected by white-nose syndrome? Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 92–98 10.1890/080187 (doi:10.1890/080187) - DOI

Publication types