Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;252(6):915-28.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f3efb0.

Clinical operational tolerance after renal transplantation: current status and future challenges

Affiliations
Review

Clinical operational tolerance after renal transplantation: current status and future challenges

Giuseppe Orlando et al. Ann Surg. 2010 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Ann Surg. 2011 Jun;253(6):1236. Cocco, Pierpaolo Di [corrected to Di Cocco, Pierpaolo]

Abstract

In solid organ transplantation, the achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state [also referred to as clinical operational tolerance (COT)] represents the ultimate goal. Although COT is feasible and safe in selected cases after liver transplantation, it is an exceptional finding after other types of solid organ transplantation. In the field of renal transplantation (RT), approximately 100 cases of COT have been reported to date, mainly in patients who were not compliant with their immunosuppressive regimens or in individuals who had previously received a bone marrow transplant for hematological disorders. On the basis of promising results obtained in animal models, several tolerogenic protocols have been attempted in humans, but most have failed to achieve robust and stable COT after RT. Molecule-based regimens have been largely ineffective, whereas cell-based regimens have provided some encouraging results. In these latter regimens, apart from standard IS, patients usually receive perioperative infusion of donor bone marrow-derived stem cells, which are able to interact with the immune cells of the host and mitigate their response to engraftment. Unfortunately, most renal transplant patients who developed acute rejection-occurring either during the weaning protocol or after complete withdrawal of IS-eventually lost their grafts. Currently, the immune monitoring necessary for predicting the presence and persistence of donor-specific unresponsiveness is not available. Overall, the present review will provide a conceptual framework for COT and conclude that stable and robust COT after RT remains an elusive goal and that the different strategies attempted to date are not yet reproducibly safe or effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashton-Chess J, Giral M, Soulillou JP, et al. Can immune monitoring help to minimize immunosuppression in kidney transplantation? Transplant Int. 2009;22:110–119. - PubMed
    1. Karam VH, Gasquet I, Delvart V, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors beyond 10 years after liver, kidney, and heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;76:1699–1704. - PubMed
    1. Sayegh MH, Remuzzi G. Clinical update: immunosuppression minimisation. Lancet. 2007;369:1676–1678. - PubMed
    1. Ashton-Chess J, Giral M, Brouard S, et al. Spontaneous operational tolerance after immunosuppressive drug withdrawal in clinical renal allotransplantation. Transplantation. 2007;84:1215–1219. - PubMed
    1. Orlando G, Soker S, Wood K. Clinical operational tolerance after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2009;50:1247–1257. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances