Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Feb;25(1):18-28.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-1044-9. Epub 2010 Nov 27.

Assessment of intraoperative motor evoked potentials for predicting postoperative paraplegia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Affiliations
Case Reports

Assessment of intraoperative motor evoked potentials for predicting postoperative paraplegia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Toshinori Horiuchi et al. J Anesth. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Monitoring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) has been recognized as a highly reliable method to detect intraoperative spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in aortic repair. However, the data regarding the sensitivity and specificity of MEPs for predicting postoperative paraplegia are limited. We retrospectively assessed the value of intraoperative MEP amplitudes for predicting postoperative paraplegia.

Methods: The medical records of 44 patients were reviewed. A train-of-five stimulation was delivered to C3-C4, and MEPs were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis and the tibialis anterior muscles. The cutoff point for detecting SCI was set at 75% decrease of the baseline MEP. Receiver operating characteristic curves were applied at various cutoff points.

Results: Three patients (6.8%) had postoperative paraplegia. The minimum MEP during surgery had 100% sensitivity and 64.9% specificity in predicting paraplegia, and the MEP at the end of surgery had 66.7% sensitivity and 78.0% specificity in predicting paraplegia: only 1 patient, who had borderline paraplegia (right monoparesis), showed a false-negative result. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that adequate cutoff points for the minimum MEP during surgery and for the MEP amplitude at the end of surgery were a 75-90% decrease and a 64-75% decrease of the baseline MEP, respectively.

Conclusion: Monitoring MEPs had relatively high sensitivity and acceptable specificity, with the cutoff point set at 75% decrease of the baseline MEP, for predicting paraplegia and paraparesis. Because of the small sample in our study, further investigations would be necessary to investigate an adequate cutoff point that could predict postoperative paraplegia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Vasc Surg. 1997 Oct;26(4):616-22 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Nov;74(5):S1881-4; discussion S1892-8 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 2008 Apr;108(4):580-7 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 2006 May;104(5):939-43 - PubMed
    1. J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jan;29(1):48-57; discussion 57-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources