Quality improvement in neurology: AAN Parkinson disease quality measures: report of the Quality Measurement and Reporting Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
- PMID: 21115958
- PMCID: PMC3014235
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ff96dd
Quality improvement in neurology: AAN Parkinson disease quality measures: report of the Quality Measurement and Reporting Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Abstract
Background: Measuring the quality of health care is a fundamental step toward improving health care and is increasingly used in pay-for-performance initiatives and maintenance of certification requirements. Measure development to date has focused on primary care and common conditions such as diabetes; thus, the number of measures that apply to neurologic care is limited. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) identified the need for neurologists to develop measures of neurologic care and to establish a process to accomplish this.
Objective: To adapt and test the feasibility of a process for independent development by the AAN of measures for neurologic conditions for national measurement programs.
Methods: A process that has been used nationally for measure development was adapted for use by the AAN. Topics for measure development are chosen based upon national priorities, available evidence base from a systematic literature search, gaps in care, and the potential impact for quality improvement. A panel composed of subject matter and measure development methodology experts oversees the development of the measures. Recommendation statements and their corresponding level of evidence are reviewed and considered for development into draft candidate measures. The candidate measures are refined by the expert panel during a 30-day public comment period and by review by the American Medical Association for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) II codes. All final AAN measures are approved by the AAN Board of Directors.
Results: Parkinson disease (PD) was chosen for measure development. A review of the medical literature identified 258 relevant recommendation statements. A 28-member panel approved 10 quality measures for PD that included full specifications and CPT II codes.
Conclusion: The AAN has adapted a measure development process that is suitable for national measurement programs and has demonstrated its capability to independently develop quality measures.
Comment in
-
Quality improvement in neurology: AAN Parkinson disease quality measures.Neurology. 2011 Jul 26;77(4):406; author reply 406. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182246fb2. Neurology. 2011. PMID: 21788621 No abstract available.
References
-
- Lee TH. Eulogy for a quality measure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1175–1177. - PubMed
-
- Harman JS, Scholle SH, Ng JH, et al. Association of Health Plans' Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance with outcomes of enrollees with diabetes. Med Care 2010;48:217–223. - PubMed
-
- Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Schmaltz SP, Wachter RM. Accountability measures: using measurement to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med 2010;363:68–688. - PubMed
-
- Roland M, Campbell S, Bailey N, Whalley D, Sibbald B. Financial incentives to improve the quality of primary care in the U.K.: predicting the consequences of change. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2006;7:18–26.
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Overview: Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. Available at: http://www.coms.gov/pqri/01_overview.asp? Accessed May 3, 2010.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical