Outcome of shock wave lithotripsy as monotherapy for large solitary renal stones (>2 cm in size) without stenting
- PMID: 21116354
- PMCID: PMC2978434
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.70568
Outcome of shock wave lithotripsy as monotherapy for large solitary renal stones (>2 cm in size) without stenting
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) as monotherapy for solitary renal stones larger than 2 cm without ureteral stenting.
Materials and methods: Our retrospective study included patients with solitary renal radio opaque stones larger than 2 cm treated with SWL using electromagnetic Dornier Compact S lithotripter device (Wessling, Germany) for a period of 3 years (September 2002-2005). Stone clearance was assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months with plain X-rays of kidney, ureter, and bladder region, ultrasonography, and tomograms. Stone-free status, morbidity of the procedure, and fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) were studied. A stone-free state was defined as no radiologic evidence of stone. Success was defined as complete clearance + CIRF.
Results: Fifty-five patients, aged 11-65 years (mean 49.8) underwent SWL. Of them, only two were children. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The stone size was 21-28 mm (average 24 mm). The mean number of shocks were 3732 (range 724-12,100) and average energy level was 14 kV (range 11-16 kV). The mean follow-up was 18 months (range 3-22 months). Over all, stone-free status was achieved in 50% and success in 81% at 3 months. Stone clearance was not affected by stone location. Stones <25 mm had better stone-free rate (54.16% vs. 28.5%) and lesser CIRF (14.6% vs. 28.5%) when compared to larger stones (>26 mm) (P = -0.10). Of 54 patients, 39 developed steinstrasse with mean length of 3.2 cm (range 1.4-6.2 cm) and only four required intervention. Effectiveness quotient (EQ) for SWL monotherapy for solitary renal stones more than 2 cm was 25.3%. The EQ for stones <25 mm and those more than 25 mm were 28.4% and 10% (P = -0.12), respectively. There was a lesser trend of difference between stones with size <25 and more than 25 mm. During the last review, the overall stone-free rate was 67.2%.
Conclusions: SWL monotherapy was safe but significantly less effective for solitary renal stones larger than 2 cm. It can only be suggested to those who refuse surgical intervention. Pretreatment DJ stenting is not mandatory when closer follow-up is ensured.
Keywords: DJ stenting; Lithotripsy; SWL monotherapy; renal calculi.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet. 1980;2:1265–8. - PubMed
-
- Motola JA, Smith AD. Therapeutic options for the management of upper tract calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 1990;17:191–206. - PubMed
-
- Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, et al. Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1987;138:485–90. - PubMed
-
- Kurien A, Symons S, Manohar T, Desai M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: Equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves. BJU Int. 2009;103:81–4. - PubMed
-
- Coptcoat MJ, Webb DR, Kellet MJ, Whitfield HN, Wickham JEA. The steinstrasse: A legacy of ESWL. Eur Urol. 1988;14:93–5. - PubMed