A useful immunohistochemical approach to evaluate intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and to predict their prognosis
- PMID: 21117029
- DOI: 10.14670/HH-26.79
A useful immunohistochemical approach to evaluate intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and to predict their prognosis
Abstract
An examination was performed on 16 intraductal proliferative breast lesions diagnosed as intraductal papillomas (IP) or usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), which were followed up for more than 3 years. An immunohistochemical marker panel combining myoepithelial markers, high-molecular-weight keratin (HMWK) and neuroendocrine markers was used. Two of 11 IP cases were re-evaluated as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). These cases developed breast cancer after the first operation. One IP case showed repeated recurrences. None of the other IP and UDH cases had breast cancer or recurrence. The ADH, DCIS and the recurrent IP showing a solid growth lacked myoepithelia, but the recurrent IP expressed HMWK, immunohistochemically. Interestingly, these three lesions were weakly positive for neuroendocrine markers. All other IPs and UDHs, including lesions having solid components, were negative for neuroendocrine markers, and most of them were positive for myoepithelial markers and/or HMWK. A combination of the above immunohistochemical markers seems useful to evaluate intraductal proliferative lesions and to predict their prognosis. In particular, intraductal proliferative lesions with solid components exhibiting positivity for neuroendocrine markers should be followed up carefully to monitor breast cancer risk or recurrence.
Similar articles
-
Myoepithelial cells in solid variant of intraductal papillary carcinoma of the breast: a potential diagnostic pitfall and a proposal of an immunohistochemical panel in the differential diagnosis with intraductal papilloma with usual ductal hyperplasia.Virchows Arch. 2007 May;450(5):539-47. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0402-y. Epub 2007 Mar 22. Virchows Arch. 2007. PMID: 17377808
-
Estrogen Receptor and Cytokeratin 5 Are Reliable Markers to Separate Usual Ductal Hyperplasia From Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Jul;140(7):686-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0238-OA. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016. PMID: 27116088
-
[Value of CK5/6, CK14, ER and PR detection in differential diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;37(10):749-52. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26813593 Chinese.
-
Characterization of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ with and without regressive changes: diagnostic and biologic implications.Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2009 Dec;17(6):495-9. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3181a1743a. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2009. PMID: 19407654 Review.
-
The role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of papillary lesions of the breast.J Clin Pathol. 2009 May;62(5):407-13. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2008.063016. Epub 2009 Jan 6. J Clin Pathol. 2009. PMID: 19126567 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of breast: analyses of three cases.Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017 Sep 1;10(9):9575-9582. eCollection 2017. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017. PMID: 31966834 Free PMC article.
-
Ras protein expression as a marker for breast cancer.Oncol Lett. 2016 Jun;11(6):3637-3642. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4461. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Oncol Lett. 2016. PMID: 27284366 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous