Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan;12(1):1-19.
doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00649.x.

Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen

Affiliations
Review

Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen

Zhaohui Liu et al. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Pyrenophora teres, causal agent of net blotch of barley, exists in two forms, designated P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata, which induce net form net blotch (NFNB) and spot form net blotch (SFNB), respectively. Significantly more work has been performed on the net form than on the spot form although recent activity in spot form research has increased because of epidemics of SFNB in barley-producing regions. Genetic studies have demonstrated that NFNB resistance in barley is present in both dominant and recessive forms, and that resistance/susceptibility to both forms can be conferred by major genes, although minor quantitative trait loci have also been identified. Early work on the virulence of the pathogen showed toxin effector production to be important in disease induction by both forms of pathogen. Since then, several laboratories have investigated effectors of virulence and avirulence, and both forms are complex in their interaction with the host. Here, we assemble recent information from the literature that describes both forms of this important pathogen and includes reports describing the host-pathogen interaction with barley. We also include preliminary findings from a genome sequence survey.

Taxonomy: Pyrenophora teres Drechs. Kingdom Fungi; Phylum Ascomycota; Subphylum Pezizomycotina; Class Dothideomycete; Order Pleosporales; Family Pleosporaceae; Genus Pyrenophora, form teres and form maculata.

Identification: To date, no clear morphological or life cycle differences between the two forms of P. teres have been identified, and therefore they are described collectively. Towards the end of the growing season, the fungus produces dark, globosely shaped pseudothecia, about 1-2mm in diameter, on barley. Ascospores measuring 18-28µm × 43-61µm are light brown and ellipsoidal and often have three to four transverse septa and one or two longitudinal septa in the median cells. Conidiophores usually arise singly or in groups of two or three and are lightly swollen at the base. Conidia measuring 30-174µm × 15-23µm are smoothly cylindrical and straight, round at both ends, subhyaline to yellowish brown, often with four to six pseudosepta. Morphologically, P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata are indistinguishable.

Host range: Comprehensive work on the host range of P. teres f. teres has been performed; however, little information on the host range of P. teres f. maculata is available. Hordeum vulgare and H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum are considered to be the primary hosts for P. teres. However, natural infection by P. teres has been observed in other wild Hordeum species and related species from the genera Bromus, Avena and Triticum, including H. marinum, H. murinum, H. brachyantherum, H. distichon, H. hystrix, B. diandrus, A. fatua, A. sativa and T. aestivum (Shipton et al., 1973, Rev. Plant Pathol. 52:269-290). In artificial inoculation experiments under field conditions, P. teres f. teres has been shown to infect a wide range of gramineous species in the genera Agropyron, Brachypodium, Elymus, Cynodon, Deschampsia, Hordelymus and Stipa (Brown et al., 1993, Plant Dis. 77:942-947). Additionally, 43 gramineous species were used in a growth chamber study and at least one of the P. teres f. teres isolates used was able to infect 28 of the 43 species tested. However, of these 28 species, 14 exhibited weak type 1 or 2 reactions on the NFNB 1-10 scale (Tekauz, 1985). These reaction types are small pin-point lesions and could possibly be interpreted as nonhost reactions. In addition, the P. teres f. teres host range was investigated under field conditions by artificially inoculating 95 gramineous species with naturally infected barley straw. Pyrenophora teres f. teres was re-isolated from 65 of the species when infected leaves of adult plants were incubated on nutrient agar plates; however, other than Hordeum species, only two of the 65 host species exhibited moderately susceptible or susceptible field reaction types, with most species showing small dark necrotic lesions indicative of a highly resistant response to P. teres f. teres. Although these wild species have the potential to be alternative hosts, the high level of resistance identified for most of the species makes their role as a source of primary inoculum questionable.

Disease symptoms: Two types of symptom are caused by P. teres. These are net-type lesions caused by P. teres f. teres and spot-type lesions caused by P. teres f. maculata. The net-like symptom, for which the disease was originally named, has characteristic narrow, dark-brown, longitudinal and transverse striations on infected leaves. The spot form symptom consists of dark-brown, circular to elliptical lesions surrounded by a chlorotic or necrotic halo of varying width.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disease reactions for combinations of host lines and pathogen isolates showing major pathogen gene–host gene interactions. Top panel: a single Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolate on two host lines (two leaves of each line are shown) yielding a high level of resistance on Rika (top two leaves), but a high level of susceptibility on Kombar (bottom two leaves). Middle panel shows the same host line Rika inoculated with two different P. teres f. teres isolates: 15A (top two leaves) and 6A (bottom two leaves). Rika and Kombar both harbour dominant susceptibility genes segregating in repulsion (Abu Qamar et al., 2008). Bottom panel: barley cultivar Lacey inoculated with two different P. teres f. maculata isolates varying in virulence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sexual and asexual dispersal structures of Pyrenophora teres f. teres. (a) Conidia (grey arrow), conidiophores (black arrow) and mycelium (white arrow). Scale bar, 40 µm. (b) Conidia containing three to five septa. Scale bar, 40 µm. (c) Barley straw containing dark fungal pseudothecia. Scale bar, 2.5 mm. (d) Immature pseudothecia showing the globose shape and the dark‐brown, hair‐like setae. Scale bar, 1 mm. (e) The breakage of a pseudothecia showing immature, bitunicate asci (black arrow), and a mature asci (white arrow) in which the inner wall has erupted and a few ascospores have been ejected. Scale bar, 80 µm. (f) Close look at the ascospores that have three or four transverse septa and one or two longitudinal septa in the median cells. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Life cycle of Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata.

References

    1. Able, A. (2003) Role of reactive oxygen species in the response of barley to necrotrophic pathogens. Protoplasma, 221, 137–143. - PubMed
    1. Abu Qamar, M. , Liu, Z.H. , Faris, J.D. , Chao, S. , Edwards, M.C. , Lai, Z. , Franckowiak, J.D. and Friesen, T.L. (2008) A region of barley chromosome 6H harbors multiple major genes associated with net type net blotch resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117, 1261–1270. - PubMed
    1. Afanasenko, O. , Mironenko, N. , Filatova, O. , Kopahnke, D. , Krämer, I. and Ordon, F. (2007) Genetics of host–pathogen interactions in the Pyrenophora teres f. teres (net form)–barley (Hordeum vulgare) pathosystem. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 117, 267–280.
    1. Afanasenko, O.S. , Jalli, M. , Pinnschmidt, H.O. , Filatova, O. and Platz, G.J. (2009) Development of an international standard set of barley differential genotypes for Pyrenophora teres f. teres . Plant Pathol. 58, 665–676.
    1. Alcorn, J.L. (1988) The taxonomy of ‘Helminthosporium’ species. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 26, 37–56.

LinkOut - more resources