Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010;14(6):R220.
doi: 10.1186/cc9354. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

PD-L1 blockade improves survival in experimental sepsis by inhibiting lymphocyte apoptosis and reversing monocyte dysfunction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

PD-L1 blockade improves survival in experimental sepsis by inhibiting lymphocyte apoptosis and reversing monocyte dysfunction

Yan Zhang et al. Crit Care. 2010.

Abstract

Introduction: Lymphocyte apoptosis and monocyte dysfunction play a pivotal role in sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Programmed death-1 (PD1) and its ligand programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) exert inhibitory function by regulating the balance among T cell activation, tolerance, and immunopathology. PD-1 deficiency or blockade has been shown to improve survival in murine sepsis. However, PD-L1 and PD-1 differ in their expression patterns and the role of PD-L1 in sepsis-induced immunosuppression is still unknown.

Methods: Sepsis was induced in adult C57BL/6 male mice via cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). The expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on peripheral T cells, B cells and monocytes were measured 24 hours after CLP or sham surgery. Additionally, the effects of anti-PD-L1 antibody on lymphocyte number, apoptosis of spleen and thymus, activities of caspase-8 and caspase-9, cytokine production, bacterial clearance, and survival were determined.

Results: Expression of PD-1 on T cells, B cells and monocytes and PD-L1 on B cells and monocytes were up-regulated in septic animals compared to sham-operated controls. PD-L1 blockade significantly improved survival of CLP mice. Anti-PD-L1 antibody administration prevented sepsis-induced depletion of lymphocytes, increased tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 production, decreased IL-10 production, and enhanced bacterial clearance.

Conclusions: PD-L1 blockade exerts a protective effect on sepsis at least partly by inhibiting lymphocyte apoptosis and reversing monocyte dysfunction. Anti-PD-L1 antibody administration may be a promising therapeutic strategy for sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on T cells, B cells and monocytes. (A) Percent of PD-1 expression on CD3+ T cells, CD19+ B cells and CD11b+ monocytes 24 h after CLP (n = 5) or sham control surgery (n = 5). (B) Percent of PD-L1 expression on CD3+ T cells, CD19+B cells and CD11b+ monocytes 24 h after CLP (n = 5) or sham control surgery (n = 5), (C, D) Representative PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on T, B cells and monocytes detected by flow cytometry. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anti-PD-L1 antibody administration protects mice from sepsis-induced lethality. (A) Anti-PD-L1 antibody pretreatment protected mice from CLP. CLP mice were given 50 μg anti-PD-L1 antibody (n = 18), 50 μg isotype control antibody (n = 12) or 0.2 mL saline intraperitoneally 24 h before CLP surgery. (B) Effect of intraperitoneal anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment given 3 h after CLP. CLP mice were given 50 μg anti-PD-L1 antibody (n = 18), 50 μg isotype control antibody (n = 12) or 0.2 mL saline (n = 12) intraperitoneally 3 h after CLP. Survival was monitored for eight days. Data are shown as the survival percent of animals. *P <0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PD-L1 blockade inhibits cell apoptosis in spleen and thymus. Mice underwent a sham procedure, CLP, CLP plus anti-PD-L1 or isotype administration (n = 5 for each group). Spleen and thymus were harvested 24 h after surgery. (A) Representative sections analyzed by an in situ TUNEL assay. (B) Percent of the TUNEL-positive cells is used to show the cell apoptosis in spleen and thymus of the 4 groups. * P <0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell numbers in blood (A), spleen (B) and thymus (C). Mice underwent a sham procedure, CLP, CLP plus anti-PD-L1 administration, or CLP plus isotype administration (n = 5 for each group). Blood, thymus and spleen were harvested 24 h after surgery. The total cell number was counted after lysis of erythrocytes (for spleen and thymus, preparation of a single-cell suspension was required). Lymphocyte numbers (CD3+ T cells, CD3- T cells, CD19+ B cells) were calculated by the total number and percent of lymphocyte subgroups resulting from FACS analysis, respectively. * P <0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways contribute to decreased lymphocyte apoptosis in vivo. Mice underwent sham procedure, CLP, CLP plus anti-PD-L1 antibody administration, or CLP plus isotype administration. Thymus was harvested 24 h after surgery and stained for annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) (A, D) or FITC-labeled IEHD-FMK (B, E) or LEHD-FMK (C, F) which can irreversibly binds to activated caspase-8 or activated caspase-9. (D), (E), and (F) are the representative flow cytometry dot plots. Values in the upper right quadrant indicate the percent of apoptotic cells, caspase-8 or caspase-9 positive cells, respectively. * P <0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Levels of plasma cytokines and bacterial clearance. Mice underwent a sham procedure, CLP, CLP plus anti-PD-L1 administration, or CLP plus isotype control administration (n = 5 for each group). Levels of TNF-α (A), IL-6 (B) and IL-10 (C) were measured 24 h after surgery. Treatment with anti-PDL1 antibody improves bacterial clearance in septic mice. Mice that received anti-PD-L1 antibody exhibited a deceased bacterial burden in peritoneal lavage fluid in comparison with mice that received isotype antibody or saline (D), Mice that received anti-PD-L1 antibody exhibited a deceased bacterial burden in blood in comparison with mice that received isotype antibody or saline (E), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01.

References

    1. Deans KJ, Haley M, Natanson C, Eichacker PQ, Minneci PC. Novel therapies for sepsis: a review. J Trauma. 2005;58:867–874. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000158244.69179.94. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riedemann NC, Guo RF, Ward PA. The enigma of sepsis. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:460–467. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wisnoski N, Chung CS, Chen Y, Huang X, Ayala A. The contribution of CD4+ CD25+ T-regulatory-cells to immune suppression in sepsis. Shock. 2007;27:251–257. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000239780.33398.e4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, McDunn JE, Ferguson TA. The sepsis seesaw: tilting toward immunosuppression. Nat Med. 2009;15:496–497. doi: 10.1038/nm0509-496. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lang JD, Matute-Bello G. Lymphocytes, apoptosis and sepsis: making the jump from mice to humans. Crit Care. 2009;13:109–110. doi: 10.1186/cc7144. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types