Kinematic differences between front crawl sprint and distance swimmers at sprint pace
- PMID: 21120744
- DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.523090
Kinematic differences between front crawl sprint and distance swimmers at sprint pace
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to use three-dimensional methods to determine whether there are distinct kinematic differences between sprint and distance front crawl swimmers when swimming at a sprint pace. Seven sprint and eight distance specialists performed four 25-m sprints through a 6.75-m(3) calibrated space recorded by six gen-locked cameras. The variables of interest were: average swim velocity, stroke length, stroke frequency, upper limb and foot displacement, elbow angle, shoulder and hip roll angles, duration of stroke phases, and the time corresponding to particular events within the stroke cycle relative to hand entry. Differences between sprint and distance swimmers were assessed with an independent t-test for each variable, in addition to effect size calculations. Differences between sprint and distance front crawl swimmers were generally small and not significant when swimming at a sprint pace. Differences were limited to temporal aspects of the stroke cycle. These findings suggest that coaches should not train sprint and distance specialists differently in terms of technique development.
Similar articles
-
Kinematic differences between front crawl sprint and distance swimmers at a distance pace.J Sports Sci. 2012;30(6):601-8. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.660186. Epub 2012 Feb 9. J Sports Sci. 2012. PMID: 22315962
-
Kinematic Differences in Shoulder Roll and Hip Roll at Different Front Crawl Speeds in National Level Swimmers.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jan;34(1):20-25. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003281. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 31567840
-
Shoulder and hip roll changes during 200-m front crawl swimming.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Dec;40(12):2129-36. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818160bc. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008. PMID: 18981935
-
Body roll in swimming: a review.J Sports Sci. 2010 Feb;28(3):229-36. doi: 10.1080/02640410903508847. J Sports Sci. 2010. PMID: 20131140 Review.
-
The methodology of resistance training is crucial for improving short-medium distance front crawl performance in competitive swimmers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 26;15:1406518. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1406518. eCollection 2024. Front Physiol. 2024. PMID: 39129754 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of an automatic tracking software in underwater motion analysis.J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Dec 1;12(4):660-7. eCollection 2013. J Sports Sci Med. 2013. PMID: 24421725 Free PMC article.
-
Intracycle Velocity Variation in Swimming: A Systematic Scoping Review.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;10(3):308. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030308. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36978699 Free PMC article.
-
Inertial Sensors in Swimming: Detection of Stroke Phases through 3D Wrist Trajectory.J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Aug 1;18(3):438-447. eCollection 2019 Sep. J Sports Sci Med. 2019. PMID: 31427865 Free PMC article.
-
Integrated Timing of Stroking, Breathing, and Kicking in Front-Crawl Swimming: A Novel Stroke-by-Stroke Approach Using Wearable Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;22(4):1419. doi: 10.3390/s22041419. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35214321 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in kinematics and energy cost between front crawl and backstroke below the anaerobic threshold.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jun;118(6):1107-1118. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3841-z. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018. PMID: 29556773
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources