Offspring viability benefits but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males
- PMID: 21123248
- PMCID: PMC3097854
- DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0976
Offspring viability benefits but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males
Abstract
Traditional models of sexual selection posit that male courtship signals evolve as indicators of underlying male genetic quality. An alternative hypothesis is that sexual conflict over mating generates antagonistic coevolution between male courtship persistence and female resistance. In the scarabaeine dung beetle Onthophagus taurus, females are more likely to mate with males that have high courtship rates. Here, we examine the effects of exposing females to males with either high or low courtship rates on female lifetime productivity and offspring viability. Females exposed to males with high courtship rates mated more often and produced offspring with greater egg-adult viability. Female productivity and lifespan were unaffected by exposure to males with high courtship rates. The data are consistent with models of sexual selection based on indirect genetic benefits, and provide little evidence for sexual conflict in this system.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.Proc Biol Sci. 2014 May 7;281(1785):20140281. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0281. Print 2014 Jun 22. Proc Biol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24807253 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of reproduction on courtship, fertility and longevity within and between alternative male mating tactics of the horned beetle, Onthophagus binodis.J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):488-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01274.x. J Evol Biol. 2007. PMID: 17305814
-
Transgenerational effects of maternal sexual interactions in seed beetles.Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Sep;121(3):282-291. doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0093-y. Epub 2018 May 25. Heredity (Edinb). 2018. PMID: 29802349 Free PMC article.
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
-
Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2020 Mar 1;288:113354. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.113354. Epub 2019 Dec 9. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 31830474 Review.
Cited by
-
Female genitalia can evolve more rapidly and divergently than male genitalia.Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 21;10(1):1312. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09353-0. Nat Commun. 2019. PMID: 30899023 Free PMC article.
-
Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120042. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0042. Print 2013 Mar 5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23339234 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Male courtship behavior and weapon trait as indicators of indirect benefit in the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 27;8(12):e83278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083278. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24386170 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution and plasticity of morph-specific integration in the bull-headed dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 2;10(19):10558-10570. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6711. eCollection 2020 Oct. Ecol Evol. 2020. PMID: 33072280 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.Proc Biol Sci. 2014 May 7;281(1785):20140281. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0281. Print 2014 Jun 22. Proc Biol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24807253 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
-
- Kokko H., Jennions M. D., Brooks R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 43–6610.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110259 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110259) - DOI - DOI
-
- Partridge L., Fowler K. 1990. Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 419–42510.1016/0022-1910(90)90059-O (doi:10.1016/0022-1910(90)90059-O) - DOI - DOI
-
- Chapman T., Liddle L. F., Kalb J. M., Wolfner M. F., Partridge L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241–24410.1038/373241a0 (doi:10.1038/373241a0) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Parker G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (eds Blum M. S., Blum N. A.), pp. 123–166 London, UK: Academic Press
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources