The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates
- PMID: 21123266
- PMCID: PMC3107657
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2333
The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates
Abstract
Understanding how individual identity is processed from faces remains a complex problem. Contrast reversal, showing faces in photographic negative, impairs face recognition in humans and demonstrates the importance of surface-based information (shading and pigmentation) in face recognition. We tested the importance of contrast information for face encoding in chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys using a computerized face-matching task. Results showed that contrast reversal (positive to negative) selectively impaired face processing in these two species, although the impairment was greater for chimpanzees. Unlike chimpanzees, however, monkeys performed just as well matching negative to positive faces, suggesting that they retained some ability to extract identity information from negative faces. A control task showed that chimpanzees, but not rhesus monkeys, performed significantly better matching face parts compared with whole faces after a contrast reversal, suggesting that contrast reversal acts selectively on face processing, rather than general visual-processing mechanisms. These results confirm the importance of surface-based cues for face processing in chimpanzees and humans, while the results were less salient for rhesus monkeys. These findings make a significant contribution to understanding the evolution of cognitive specializations for face processing among primates, and suggest potential differences between monkeys and apes.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).J Comp Psychol. 2000 Mar;114(1):47-60. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.47. J Comp Psychol. 2000. PMID: 10739311 Free PMC article.
-
Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):390-402. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.390. J Comp Psychol. 2008. PMID: 19014263 Free PMC article.
-
Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0341-x. Epub 2010 Jul 15. Anim Cogn. 2011. PMID: 20632050 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of face processing in primates.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1764-77. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0358. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011. PMID: 21536559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What can we learn about human individual face recognition from experimental studies in monkeys?Vision Res. 2019 Apr;157:142-158. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Vision Res. 2019. PMID: 31230664 Review.
Cited by
-
Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.Vis cogn. 2013;21(6):10.1080/13506285.2013.823138. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.823138. Vis cogn. 2013. PMID: 24244103 Free PMC article.
-
The Neural Dynamics of Face Ensemble and Central Face Processing.J Neurosci. 2024 Feb 14;44(7):e1027232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1027-23.2023. J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38148151 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.Perception. 2012;41(4):460-73. doi: 10.1068/p7151. Perception. 2012. PMID: 22896918 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of facial color pattern complexity in lemurs.Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 9;7(1):15181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15393-7. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29123214 Free PMC article.
-
Intranasal oxytocin selectively modulates the behavior of rhesus monkeys in an expression matching task.Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 23;9(1):15187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51422-3. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31645593 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tanaka J. W., Farah M. J. 1993. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 46, 225–245 - PubMed
-
- Rhodes G. 1988. Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception 17, 43–6310.1068/p170043 (doi:10.1068/p170043) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C. J. 2002. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 255–26010.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4 (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yin R. K. 1969. Looking at upside-down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 141–14510.1037/h0027474 (doi:10.1037/h0027474) - DOI - DOI
-
- Valentine T. 1988. Upside-down faces: a review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition. Brit. J. Psychol. 79, 471–491 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources