Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Winter;9(4):453-61.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0055.

A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology

Affiliations

A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology

Jia Shi et al. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter.

Abstract

We have developed and validated a tool for assessing understanding of a selection of fundamental concepts and basic knowledge in undergraduate introductory molecular and cell biology, focusing on areas in which students often have misconceptions. This multiple-choice Introductory Molecular and Cell Biology Assessment (IMCA) instrument is designed for use as a pre- and posttest to measure student learning gains. To develop the assessment, we first worked with faculty to create a set of learning goals that targeted important concepts in the field and seemed likely to be emphasized by most instructors teaching these subjects. We interviewed students using open-ended questions to identify commonly held misconceptions, formulated multiple-choice questions that included these ideas as distracters, and reinterviewed students to establish validity of the instrument. The assessment was then evaluated by 25 biology experts and modified based on their suggestions. The complete revised assessment was administered to more than 1300 students at three institutions. Analysis of statistical parameters including item difficulty, item discrimination, and reliability provides evidence that the IMCA is a valid and reliable instrument with several potential uses in gauging student learning of key concepts in molecular and cell biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Item difficulty (P) values for each question on the IMCA for Fall 2008 and Fall 2009 pre- and posttests. P values represent percentages of correct answers. Results are based on the 671 students who took the pre- and posttests in class. Yellow bars show the correct answer percentages for each question on the pretest; green bars show the increases in correct answer percentages between pre- and posttest for each question. Questions are grouped according to learning goal (see Table 2).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Item discrimination (D) values for questions on the IMCA for the 671 students who took the pre- and posttests in class. Questions with substantial increases in P value (Figure 1) and low D values on the posttest (most students answered correctly) correspond to concepts on which most students gained understanding during the course. Questions with high D values on both the pre- and posttests correspond to concepts that primarily only the stronger students understood at both the beginning and end of the course (see Discussion for further explanation). Questions are grouped according to learning goal (see Table 2).

References

    1. Adams W. K., Perkins K. K., Podolefsky N. S., Dubson M., Finkelstein N. D., Wieman C. E. A new instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res. 2006;2 010101.
    1. Adams W. K., Wieman C. Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert-like thinking. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2010 in press.
    1. Anderson D. L., Fisher K. M., Norman G. J. Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2002;39:952–978.
    1. Balci S., Cakiroglu J., Tekkaya C. Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2006;34:199–203. - PubMed
    1. Barak J., Sheva B., Gorodetsky M., Gurion B. As “process” as it can get: students' understanding of biological processes. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1999;21:1281–1292.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources