Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research
- PMID: 21127110
- DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2010.041772
Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research
Abstract
Background: There is research evidence to support the growing recognition that leadership influences successful improvement; also that it is one factor explaining slow, partial or failed improvement. However, the evidence is not strong, especially about how important one or more leaders actions were compared with other situational factors.
Methods: This paper summarises the evidence found in a review of research into different leader's roles in quality improvement.
Results: Actions suited to the situation and type of improvement appear to be the most successful, and this has implications for developing leaders to 'fit' their actions to their situation and the improvement, and for research to help them do this better.
Conclusions: The full review lists other practical implications for leaders where there is good evidence, and notes other literature which could provide guidance for leaders in the absence of research. It also considers the limitations of the research, and specific subjects for future research where knowledge and practical guidance for leaders are especially needed.
Similar articles
-
Leading improvement.J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19(6):413-30. doi: 10.1108/14777260510629661. J Health Organ Manag. 2005. PMID: 16375065 Review.
-
The ReACH Collaborative--improving quality home care.Caring. 2007 Aug;26(8):44-51. Caring. 2007. PMID: 17966307
-
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 14702504
-
What health care can be: an expanded role for financial leaders.Healthc Financ Manage. 2005 Jun;59(6):66-9. Healthc Financ Manage. 2005. PMID: 17240667
-
Support and training needs of cancer support group leaders: a review.Psychooncology. 2006 Aug;15(8):651-63. doi: 10.1002/pon.1009. Psychooncology. 2006. PMID: 16294369 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploration of contextual factors in a successful quality improvement collaborative in English ambulance services: cross-sectional survey.J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):77-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12438. Epub 2015 Aug 24. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016. PMID: 26303398 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing evidence-based practices to improve primary care for high-risk patients: study protocol for the VA high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) type III effectiveness-implementation trial.Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 15;5(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00613-9. Implement Sci Commun. 2024. PMID: 39010160 Free PMC article.
-
Co-Leadership - A Management Solution for Integrated Health and Social Care.Int J Integr Care. 2016 May 23;16(2):7. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2236. Int J Integr Care. 2016. PMID: 27616963 Free PMC article.
-
A patient-centered primary care practice approach using evidence-based quality improvement: rationale, methods, and early assessment of implementation.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S589-97. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2703-y. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24715397 Free PMC article.
-
Talking about quality: exploring how 'quality' is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 11;14:478. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-478. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25303933 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources