Intrauterine exposure to carbamazepine and specific congenital malformations: systematic review and case-control study
- PMID: 21127116
- PMCID: PMC2996546
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6581
Intrauterine exposure to carbamazepine and specific congenital malformations: systematic review and case-control study
Abstract
Objective: To identify specific major congenital malformations associated with use of carbamazepine in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Design: A review of all published cohort studies to identify key indications and a population based case-control study to test these indications.
Setting: Review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for papers about carbamazepine exposure in the first trimester of pregnancy and specific malformations, and the EUROCAT Antiepileptic Study Database, including data from 19 European population based congenital anomaly registries, 1995-2005.
Participants: The literature review covered eight cohort studies of 2680 pregnancies with carbamazepine monotherapy exposure, and the EUROCAT dataset included 98 075 registrations of malformations covering over 3.8 million births.
Main outcome measures: Overall prevalence for a major congenital malformation after exposure to carbamazepine monotherapy in the first trimester. Odds ratios for malformations with exposure to carbamazepine among cases (five types of malformation identified in the literature review) compared with two groups of controls: other non-chromosomal registrations of malformations and chromosomal syndromes.
Results: The literature review yielded an overall prevalence for a major congenital malformation of 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 4.2) after exposure to carbamazepine monotherapy in the first trimester. In 131 registrations of malformations, the fetus had been exposed to carbamazepine monotherapy. Spina bifida was the only specific major congenital malformation significantly associated with exposure to carbamazepine monotherapy (odds ratio 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 5.3) compared with no antiepileptic drug), but the risk was smaller for carbamazepine than for valproic acid (0.2, 0.1 to 0.6). There was no evidence for an association with total anomalous pulmonary venous return (no cases with carbamazepine exposure), cleft lip (with or without palate) (0.2, 0.0 to 1.3), diaphragmatic hernia (0.9, 0.1 to 6.6), or hypospadias (0.7, 0.3 to 1.6) compared with no exposure to antiepileptic drugs. Further exploratory analysis suggested a higher risk of single ventricle and atrioventricular septal defect.
Conclusion: Carbamazepine teratogenicity is relatively specific to spina bifida, though the risk is less than with valproic acid. Despite the large dataset, there was not enough power to detect moderate risks for some rare major congenital malformations.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Comment in
-
Carbamazepine in pregnancy.BMJ. 2010 Dec 2;341:c6582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6582. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 21127117 No abstract available.
References
-
- Vajda FJE, Lander CM, Hitchcock A, Graham J, Solinas C, O’Brien T, et al. Changing Australian prescribing patterns for antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy and their possible consequences. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:611-7. - PubMed
-
- Wide K, Winbladh B, Källén B. Major malformations in infants exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero, with emphasis on carbamazepine and valproic acid: a nation-wide, population-based register study. Acta Pædiatr 2004;93:174-6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical