Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 17;330(6011):1685-9.
doi: 10.1126/science.1193697. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

Cytoplasmic partitioning of P granule components is not required to specify the germline in C. elegans

Affiliations

Cytoplasmic partitioning of P granule components is not required to specify the germline in C. elegans

Christopher M Gallo et al. Science. .

Abstract

Asymmetric segregation of P granules during the first four divisions of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo is a classic example of cytoplasmic partitioning of germline determinants. It is thought that asymmetric partitioning of P granule components during mitosis is essential to distinguish germline from soma. We have identified a mutant (pptr-1) in which P granules become unstable during mitosis and P granule proteins and RNAs are distributed equally to somatic and germline blastomeres. Despite symmetric partitioning of P granule components, pptr-1 mutants segregate a germline that uniquely expresses P granules during postembryonic development. pptr-1 mutants are fertile, except at high temperatures. Hence, asymmetric partitioning of maternal P granules is not essential to specify germ cell fate. Instead, it may serve to protect the nascent germline from stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Segregation of the P granule component PGL-1 in C. elegans embryos
A) Abbreviated embryonic lineage showing the divisions that give rise to somatic (AB, EMS, C and D) and germline (P1-P4) blastomeres. All cells are shown in interphase except for the zygote, which is shown in mitosis. Circles represent PGL-1 molecules: open circles represent PGL-1 diffuse in cytoplasm and closed circles represent PGL-1 assembled into granules visible by microscopy. Pink is MEX-5, which promotes granule disassembly; localized granule assembly ensures that the majority of PGL-1 segregates with the germline (Fig. 2). B) In pptr-1 mutants, PGL-1 granules disassemble at each mitosis and equal numbers of dispersed PGL-1 molecules are segregated to all cells (Fig. 2). During interphase, PGL-1 granules reform in all cells, except in MEX-5-positive somatic blastomeres (pink). Note that somatic PGL-1 granules are not equivalent to true P granules, as they do not contain P granule-associated mRNAs, which are degraded in somatic lineages (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. P granule dynamics require par-1, mex-5/6, and pptr-1
A-E) Time-lapse images of zygotes expressing GFP::PGL-1. Image are maximum projections of confocal Z-stacks spanning 8µm (~half of embryo depth). P granule numbers are shown in Sup. Fig. 1. MEX-5 and MEX-6 are uniformly distributed in par-1 embryos and PAR-1 localizes to a reduced-size posterior domain in mex-5;mex-6 zygotes (9, 10). F) GFP::PGL-1 levels over time in wild-type and pptr-1(tm3103) zygotes. Error bars are standard deviation of mean values from 3 zygotes. In wild-type embryos, GFP::PGL-1 fluorescence does not decrease in the anterior during interphase, even though the number of visible granules decreases (Fig. 2A), consistent with granule disassembly. During mitosis, GFP::PGL-1 fluorescence and P granule size increase in the posterior (Sup. Fig. 1), consistent with granule assembly. G) Fold-enrichment of GFP::PGL-1 and GFP::GLH-1 in each P blastomere over its somatic sister. Enrichment becomes most pronounced with each division in wild-type. No enrichment is observed at any division in pptr-1 mutants. Error bars are standard deviation from values obtained from 3 focal planes in 3 embryos.
Fig 3
Fig 3. P granule components are segregated equally to germline and somatic blastomeres in pptr-1 mutants
A) Fixed wild-type and pptr-1 embryos stained with DAPI (blue) and OIC1D4 (red). Images are maximum projections of confocal Z-stacks (spanning entire embryo), except for P4 and Z2/Z3 images, which show single planes. B) Wild-type and pptr-1 embryos stained for nos-2 and cey-2 RNAs (black) by in situ hybridization. In pptr-1 embryos, nos-2 and cey-2 RNAs are present at equal levels in P3 and C, indicative of symmetric segregation during the P2 division. In pptr-1 embryos, as in wild-type, nos-2 and cey-2 RNAs levels are lower in all other blastomeres, indicative of rapid degradation of these RNAs in somatic lineages.
Fig 4
Fig 4. pptr-1 mutants specify a germline, but a minority are sterile at high temperatures
A) Embryos expressing GFP::PIE-1 or stained with NOS-1 and PGL-1 antibodies. Patterns are identical in wild-type and pptr-1, except that pptr-1 embryos lack GFP::PIE-1 foci seen in wild-type (arrows), and have lower PGL-1 levels. B) Adult wild-type and pptr-1 hermaphrodites expressing GFP::PGL-1. Gonads are outlined. Most pptr-1 hermaphrodites develop a full gonad with gametes (top panel), but at high temperatures a minority (20%) are sterile, with no gametes (lower panel). Fertile pptr-1 gonads are smaller than wild-type and yield a reduced number of progeny; unlike the P granule defect, however, the brood size defect is partially rescued by zygotic pptr-1 (Sup. Fig. 7). C) Percentage of sterile hermaphrodites and total numbers scored. Wild-type have 2 maternal and 2 zygotic pptr-1 copies (M2Z2). Mutant pptr-1 hermaphrodites (M0Z0) were crossed with wild-type males to generate M0Z1, which were allowed to self-fertilize to generate M1Z0, M1Z1 and M1Z2. Only M0Z0 and M0Z1 hermaphrodites show significant sterility, demonstrating maternal requirement. pptr-1 is also required maternally for P granule partitioning (Sup. Fig. 3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chuma S, Hosokawa M, Tanaka T, Nakatsuji N. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2009 Jul 10;306:17. - PubMed
    1. Updike D, Strome S. J. Androl. 2010 Jan-Feb;31:53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brangwynne CP, et al. Science. 2009 Jun 26;324:1729. - PubMed
    1. Kawasaki I, et al. Cell. 1998;94:635. - PubMed
    1. Gruidl ME, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:13837. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms