Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec;186(12):651-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-8001-2.

Intraoperative radiotherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast cancer : beware of one-stop shops?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intraoperative radiotherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation for early breast cancer : beware of one-stop shops?

Marie-Luise Sautter-Bihl et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) was originally introduced in breast cancer treatment as an "anticipated boost" during the procedure of breast conserving surgery (BCS). In addition to whole breast irradiation (WBI), it has yielded excellent long-term results [31, 38]. Under the assumption that the majority of in-breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) occur in the originally affected site, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as the sole treatment modality was initiated in several studies and with different techniques, one of which was IORT first with electrons, later also with conventional x-rays [29]. The question whether and for whom the gold standard of WBI may be replaced by APBI - especially IORT - alone has recently been one of the most controversial issues of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Two recently published studies by Veronesi et al. [36] and Vaidya et al. [35] presenting shortterm results of single shot IORT with electrons (ELIOT) and with an orthovoltage system (TARGIT), respectively, have further invigorated this discussion as illustrated by several letters to the editor commenting on the TARGIT study. While Vaidya et al. [35] indicate their results of IORT alone as "an alternative to WBI for selected patients" and one editorial even proclaims it as standard [6], all the authors of the respective letters [10, 16, 27, 33] strongly disagree with this conclusion. The present editorial comments on the two publications and, furthermore, provides respective statements of the breast cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Jul;185(7):425-30 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1141; author reply 1143-4 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Aug 1;77(5):1309-14 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 15;74(4):981-4 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1141; author reply 1143-4 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources