Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec 7;16(45):5669-81.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5669.

Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: predictors of progression and prognosis

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: predictors of progression and prognosis

Chin-Ann J Ong et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus is a well-known premalignant lesion of the lower esophagus that is characterized by intestinal metaplasia of the squamous epithelium. It is clinically important due to the increased risk (0.5% per annum) of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), which has a poor outcome unless diagnosed early. The current clinical management of Barrett's esophagus is hampered by the lack of accurate predictors of progression. In addition, when patients develop EA, the current staging modalities are limited in stratifying patients into different prognostic groups in order to guide the optimal therapy for an individual patient. Biomarkers have the potential to improve radically the clinical management of patients with Barrett's esophagus and EA but have not yet entered mainstream clinical practice. This is in contrast to other cancers like breast and prostate for which biomarkers are utilized routinely to inform clinical decisions. This review aims to highlight the most promising predictive and prognostic biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and EA and to discuss what is required to move the field forward towards clinical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transition of squamous epithelium to intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma, with potential useful biomarkers at each stage of the disease. The left-most panel shows normal stratified squamous epithelium. The second panel shows Barrett’s esophagus without dysplasia, with the presence of goblet cells. The third and fourth panels show Barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia, whereas the last panel shows adenocarcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phases of diagnostic and prognostic biomarker development proposed by the Early Detection Research Network and reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies before clinical implementation[23,24]. EDRN: Early Detection Research Network; REMARK: Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies.

References

    1. Playford RJ. New British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2006;55:442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, Johansson SE, Lind T, Bolling-Sternevald E, Vieth M, Stolte M, Talley NJ, Agréus L. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1825–1831. - PubMed
    1. Curvers WL, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, Visser M, Elzer B, Baak LC, Bohmer C, Mallant-Hent RC, van Oijen A, Naber AH, et al. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1523–1530. - PubMed
    1. Wani S, Puli SR, Shaheen NJ, Westhoff B, Slehria S, Bansal A, Rastogi A, Sayana H, Sharma P. Esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus after endoscopic ablative therapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:502–513. - PubMed
    1. Paull A, Trier JS, Dalton MD, Camp RC, Loeb P, Goyal RK. The histologic spectrum of Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1976;295:476–480. - PubMed

MeSH terms