Natural history of concentric left ventricular geometry in community-dwelling older adults without heart failure during seven years of follow-up
- PMID: 21129719
- PMCID: PMC3022324
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.019
Natural history of concentric left ventricular geometry in community-dwelling older adults without heart failure during seven years of follow-up
Abstract
Presence of concentric left ventricular (LV) geometry has important pathophysiologic and prognostic implications. However, little is known about its natural history in older adults. Of the 5,795 community-dwelling adults ≥65 years of age in the Cardiovascular Health Study, 1,871 without baseline heart failure had data on baseline and 7-year echocardiograms. Of these 343 (18%) had baseline concentric LV geometry (concentric remodeling 83%, concentric LV hypertrophy [LVH] 17%) and are the focus of the present study. LV geometry at year 7 was categorized into 4 groups based on LVH (LV mass indexed for height >51 g/m²·⁷) and relative wall thickness (RWT): eccentric hypertrophy (RWT ≤0.42 with LVH), concentric hypertrophy (RWT >0.42 with LVH), concentric remodeling (RWT >0.42 without LVH), and normal (RWT ≤0.42 without LVH). At year 7, LV geometry normalized in 57%, remained unchanged in 35%, and transitioned to eccentric hypertrophy in 7% of participants. Incident eccentric hypertrophy occurred in 4% and 25% of those with baseline concentric remodeling and concentric hypertrophy, respectively, and was associated with increased LV end-diastolic volume and decreased LV ejection fraction at year 7. Previous myocardial infarction and baseline above-median LV mass (>39 g/m²·⁷) and RWT (>0.46) had significant unadjusted associations with incident eccentric LVH; however, only LV mass >39 g/m²·⁷ (odds ratio 17.52, 95% confidence interval 3.91 to 78.47, p <0.001) and previous myocardial infarction (odds ratio 4.73, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 19.32, p = 0.031) had significant independent associations. In conclusion, in community-dwelling older adults with concentric LV geometry, transition to eccentric hypertrophy was uncommon but structurally maladaptive.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO, Messerli FH. Left ventricular geometry and mortality in patients >70 years of age with normal ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1396–1399. - PubMed
-
- Gardin JM, McClelland R, Kitzman D, Lima JA, Bommer W, Klopfenstein HS, Wong ND, Smith VE, Gottdiener J. M-mode echocardiographic predictors of six- to seven-year incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and mortality in an elderly cohort (the Cardiovascular Health Study) Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:1051–1057. - PubMed
-
- Gaasch WH, Delorey DE, St John Sutton MG, Zile MR. Patterns of structural and functional remodeling of the left ventricle in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:459–462. - PubMed
-
- Drazner MH. The transition from hypertrophy to failure: how certain are we? Circulation. 2005;112:936–938. - PubMed
-
- Zile MR, Lewinter MM. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume is normal in patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction: a renewed consensus in diastolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:982–985. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
