Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):915-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.026. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study

Patricia Katz  1 , Jonathan Showstack, James F Smith, Robert D Nachtigall, Susan G Millstein, Holly Wing, Michael L Eisenberg, Lauri A Pasch, Mary S Croughan, Nancy Adler
Affiliations

Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study

Patricia Katz et al. Fertil Steril. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine resource use (costs) by women presenting for infertility evaluation and treatment over 18 months, regardless of treatment pursued.

Design: Prospective cohort study in which women were followed for 18 months.

Setting: Eight infertility practices.

Patient(s): Three hundred ninety-eight women recruited from infertility practices.

Intervention(s): Women completed interviews and questionnaires at baseline and after 4, 10, and 18 months of follow-up. Medical records were abstracted after 18 months to obtain details of services used.

Main outcome measure(s): Per-person and per-successful-outcome costs.

Result(s): Treatment groups were defined as highest intensity treatment use. Twenty percent of women did not pursue cycle-based treatment; approximately half pursued IVF. Median per-person costs ranged from $1,182 for medications only to $24,373 and $38,015 for IVF and IVF-donor egg groups, respectively. Estimates of costs of successful outcomes (delivery or ongoing pregnancy by 18 months) were higher--$61,377 for IVF, for example--reflecting treatment success rates. Within the time frame of the study, costs were not significantly different for women whose outcomes were successful and women whose outcomes were not.

Conclusion(s): Although individual patient costs vary, these cost estimates developed from actual patient treatment experiences may provide patients with realistic estimates to consider when initiating infertility treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chandra A, Martinez G, Mosher W, Abma J, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2005. [Accessed September 24, 2010]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_025.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2006 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008. [Accessed September 24, 2010]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/Art/ART2006/PDF/2006ART.pdf.
    1. Collins J. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19:279–289. - PubMed
    1. Chambers G, Sullivan E, Ishihara O, Chapman M, Adamson G. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–2294. - PubMed
    1. Collins J, Bustillo M, VIsscher R, Lawrence L. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:538–545. - PubMed

Publication types