Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Feb;91(2):195-202.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Association between rs13266634 C/T polymorphisms of solute carrier family 30 member 8 (SLC30A8) and type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, type 1 diabetes--a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association between rs13266634 C/T polymorphisms of solute carrier family 30 member 8 (SLC30A8) and type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, type 1 diabetes--a meta-analysis

Kuanfeng Xu et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the association of solute carrier family 30 member 8 (SLC30A8) rs13266634 C/T polymorphism with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and type 1 diabetes (T1DM).

Methods: We searched all the publications about the association between SLC30A8 and diabetes from PubMed, and evaluated the association between SLC30A8 rs13266634 C/T polymorphism and T2DM, IGT and T1DM, respectively, by meta-analysis of all the validated studies. Allelic and genotypic comparisons between cases and controls were evaluated.

Results: Thirty six studies were included in the meta-analysis: 31 studies were analysed for rs13266634 C/T polymorphism with T2DM, 3 studies with IGT and 4 studies with T1DM. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) for allelic and genotypic comparisons (including additive model, co-dominant model, dominant model and recessive model) showed that rs13266634 C/T polymorphism was significantly associated with increased T2DM risk: OR=1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13-1.17, P<0.001, P(heterogeneity)=0.041, OR=1.34, 95% CI=1.26-1.41, P<0.001, P(heterogeneity)=0.908, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.16-1.24, P<0.001, P(heterogeneity)=0.699, and OR=1.23, 95% CI=1.17-1.30, P<0.001, P(heterogeneity)=0.801, respectively. In subgroup analyses, we found that rs13266634 C/T polymorphism was associated with T2DM risk both in Asian and European subgroup (P<0.001), but not in African (P>0.05). And the pooled odds ratio (OR) for allelic frequency comparison showed that rs13266634 C/T polymorphism was also significantly associated with IGT: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.06-1.26, P<0.001, P(heterogeneity)=0.364. Meanwhile, our meta-analysis did not suggest that rs13266634 C/T polymorphism was associated with T1DM risk (P>0.05): OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.98-1.06, P=0.328, P(heterogeneity)=0.488 for allelic frequency comparison.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis results revealed the significant association between rs13266634 C/T polymorphism and T2DM and IGT, but did not support the association between this polymorphism and T1DM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources