Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb 15;17(4):849-60.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2144. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of ENMD-2076, a novel angiogenic and Aurora kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of ENMD-2076, a novel angiogenic and Aurora kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Jennifer R Diamond et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: ENMD-2076 is a unique orally bioavailable Aurora kinase and VEGFR inhibitor. The purpose of this phase 1 study of ENMD-2076 was to determine the MTD, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles and preliminary antitumor activity.

Experimental design: Patients with refractory advanced solid malignancies were treated with ENMD-2076 orally with continuous once daily dosing. Doses from 60 to 200 mg/m(2) were evaluated using a standard 3 (to 4) + 3 design. Pharmacokinetic parameters were studied on days 1, 28, and 30 to 35 of cycle 1. Expanded MTD cohorts included patients with ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and refractory solid tumors.

Results: A total of 67 patients (46 F, 21M; ages 30-76) entered the study. Dose levels of 60, 80, 120, 200, and 160 mg/m(2) were evaluated. Two patients experienced grade 3 hypertension at 200 mg/m(2), and additional grade 3 neutropenia events limited tolerability at this dose. An intermediate dose of 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the MTD. The most common drug-related adverse events included hypertension, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. The pharmacokinetics of ENMD-2076 were characterized by a rapid absorption phase (T(max) 3-7.8 hours), a t(1/2) of 27.3 to 38.3 hours after a single dose, and dose proportional exposure. Decreased plasma sVEGFR2 was observed posttreatment. Two patients with platinum refractory/resistant ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses.

Conclusions: ENMD-2076 was well tolerated, had a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and showed promising antitumor activity, particularly in ovarian cancer. The recommended phase 2 dose of ENMD-2076 is 160 mg/m(2) administered orally once daily with continuous dosing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00658671.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

S. G. Eckhardt: consultant, EntreMed, Inc., and stock ownership, EntreMed, Inc.; G. C. Fletcher: employment, EntreMed, Inc.; J. Arnott: employment, EntreMed, Inc.; M. R. Bray: employment, EntreMed, Inc.; C. Sidor: employment, EntreMed, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plasma ENMD-2076 and ENMD-2060 concentrations and relationship of drug exposure to dose level. Points represent mean concentration for ENMD-2076 on day 1 (A) and day 28 (B) and for ENMD-2060 on day 28 (C) at the indicated dose level. Relationship of ENMD-2076 exposure (AUC0-inf) on day 1 (D) and day 28 (E) with actual dose of ENMD-2076 received, and ENMD-2060 exposure (AUC0-inf) on day 28 with actual dose of ENMD-2076 received (F). Points represent individual patients and lines represent linear regression of data. The r2s for D, E, and F are 0.627, 0.401, and 0.118, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, Plasma sVEGFR2 was assayed at baseline (cycle 1, day 1) and at cycle 1, day 28 (*P < 0.001). B, Plasma sVEGFR2 on day 1 and day 28 after continuous dosing during cycle 1 by dosing cohort (*P < 0.001 compared to day 1 in same dosing cohort, **P < 0.05 compared to day 1 in same dosing cohort). (Inset) Percent decrease in plasma sVEGFR2 on day 28 compared to day 1 after continuous dosing during cycle 1 by dosing cohort. Differences in percent change between dosing cohorts are not statistically significant by one-way ANOVA (P = 0.23).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Waterfall plot of the change in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions observed at the time of best response. Not shown, n = 9, due to unavailable tumor measurements. Dose cohorts are shown in parentheses. White bars and/or *s represent patients who remained on ENMD-2076 at least 6 months.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carmena M, Earnshaw WC. The cellular geography of aurora kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:842–54. - PubMed
    1. Marumoto T, Zhang D, Saya H. Aurora-A—a guardian of poles. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:42–50. - PubMed
    1. Katayama H, Brinkley WR, Sen S. The Aurora kinases: role in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:451–64. - PubMed
    1. Fu J, Bian M, Jiang Q, Zhang C. Roles of Aurora kinases in mitosis and tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Keen N, Taylor S. Aurora-kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:927–36. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data