Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;14(1):28-30.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2706. Epub 2010 Dec 5.

The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size

Affiliations

The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size

D Samuel Schwarzkopf et al. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

The surface area of human primary visual cortex (V1) varies substantially between individuals for unknown reasons. We found that this variability was strongly and negatively correlated with the magnitude of two common visual illusions, where two physically identical objects appear different in size as a result of their context. Because such illusions dissociate conscious perception from physical stimulation, our findings indicate that the surface area of V1 predicts variability in conscious experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a. Ebbinghaus illusion: the two central circles are physically identical but appear different in size due to the presence of the surrounding circles. b. A variant of the Ponzo illusion: the two checkerboard circles are physically identical, but appear different in size due to the three dimensional context. c. The smaller the V1, the stronger the illusion. Representative maps showing cortical regions V1-V3 on a reconstructed 3D mesh of the left hemisphere gray-white matter surface of three participants. The surface area of the left V1 and Ebbinghaus illusion strength are given for each participant. Red: V1. Green: V2. Blue: V3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots showing the inter-individual variability of the size of the visual regions V1-V3 plotted as a function of the psychophysically measured strength of the Ebbinghaus (a) and the Ponzo (b) illusions (see Supplementary Material for full details). Each data point represents a measurement from one participant. The solid black lines show the linear regression for each panel. Correlation coefficients and statistical significance are denoted above each panel. The numbers in brackets denote the bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals for the correlation coefficient.

References

    1. Dougherty RF, et al. Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. J Vis. 2003;3:586–598. - PubMed
    1. Frith C, Perry R, Lumer E. The neural correlates of conscious experience: an experimental framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 1999;3:105–114. - PubMed
    1. Sereno MI, et al. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1995;268:889–893. - PubMed
    1. Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN. Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 1989;9:2432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosking WH, Zhang Y, Schofield B, Fitzpatrick D. Orientation selectivity and the arrangement of horizontal connections in tree shrew striate cortex. J.Neurosci. 1997;17:2112–2127. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types