Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research
- PMID: 21132074
- PMCID: PMC2995462
- DOI: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095
Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research
Abstract
This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson MS. Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute’s Graduate Education Project. Journal of Information Ethics. 1996;5(1):15–33.
-
- Anderson MS. Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2000;6:443–461. - PubMed
-
- Anderson MS, Louis KS. The graduate student experience and subscription to the norms of science. Research in Higher Education. 1994;35:273–299.
-
- Anderson MS, Ronning EA, De Vries R, Martinson BC. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2007;13:437–461. - PubMed
-
- Barnes SB, Dolby RGA. The scientific ethos: A deviant viewpoint. European Journal of Sociology. 1970;11:3–25.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources