Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;18(4):989-96.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1218-6. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Prognostic value of quality of life and pain in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic value of quality of life and pain in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

Y Nancy You et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Care of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) requires careful patient selection. While curative resection offers survival benefits, significant trade-offs exist for the patient. Knowledge of patient-reported outcomes will help inform treatment decisions.

Methods: Quality of life (QOL) and pain were prospectively assessed in 105 patients treated for LRRC at a single institution, using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaires. In 54 patients enrolled and followed from diagnosis of LRRC, relationship between pretreatment pain, QOL, and overall survival (OS) were examined.

Results: Patients underwent curative surgical resection (C, 59%), noncurative surgery (NC, 12%) or nonsurgical treatment (NS, 28%). Median OS was 7.1, 1.4, and 1.9 years, respectively (C versus NC: p < 0.001; C versus NS: p = 0.006; NC versus NS: p = 0.261). Physical well-being QOL differed over time (p = 0.042), with greatest difference between C and NC surgery patients (p = 0.049). The remaining QOL domain scores and pain scores demonstrated no significant time or treatment effect. For the 54 patients assessed from diagnosis, median OS was independently predicted by treatment group (C, NC, NS: 4.3, 1.7, versus 2.4 years; p < 0.001) and pretreatment pain intensity (score ≤ 4 versus > 4: 3.8 versus 2.0 years; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Curative surgery offered prolonged survival, but significant pain exists among long-term survivors and should be a focus of survivorship care. Noncurative surgery did not offer apparent advantages over nonsurgical palliation. Patient's pretreatment pain has prognostic value, and should be assessed, treated, and considered in treatment decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival of patients from diagnosis of LRRC by different treatment groups. Curative surgery (C): solid line; Noncurative surgery (NC): hashed line; Nonsurgical treatment (NS): dotted line.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient-reported physical well-being (PWB) domain scores (median) as measured by the FACT-C questionnaire.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a and b. Patient-reported pain intensity (a) and pain interference (b) scores (median) as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory. Among the 10 distinct patients who reported pain scores after 3 years of followup, 3 had developed metastatic rectal carcinoma and their reported pain intensity scores were 5, 3 and 2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a and b. Patient-reported pain intensity (a) and pain interference (b) scores (median) as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory. Among the 10 distinct patients who reported pain scores after 3 years of followup, 3 had developed metastatic rectal carcinoma and their reported pain intensity scores were 5, 3 and 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival of patients from diagnosis of LRRC as stratified by baseline pain intensity score. Score ≤4: solid line; Score >4: hashed line.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heald RJ. The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81:503–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–40. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen MB, Laurberg S, Holm T. Current management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2009 - PubMed
    1. Silberfein EJ, Kattepogu KM, Hu CY, et al. Long-term survival and recurrence outcomes following surgery for distal rectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2010 in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on quality of life. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:349–53. - PubMed