Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;18(2):230-7.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9323-2. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Prognosis in patients achieving ≥10 METS on exercise stress testing: was SPECT imaging useful?

Jamieson M Bourque  1 , George T Charlton, Benjamin H Holland, Christopher M Belyea, Denny D Watson, George A Beller
Affiliations

Prognosis in patients achieving ≥10 METS on exercise stress testing: was SPECT imaging useful?

Jamieson M Bourque et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The benefit of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) over exercise ECG stress testing alone is unclear in individuals attaining a workload of ≥10 METS. The purpose of this prospective study is to determine mortality and nonfatal cardiac events in patients at either intermediate pretest risk for CAD or patients with known CAD, achieving ≥10 METS regardless of peak exercise heart rate. The authors previously reported a low prevalence of significant ischemia in this patient cohort.

Methods: Baseline characteristics, ECG stress test findings, and perfusion and function results from quantitative gated (99m)Tc-SPECT MPI were compared by achievement of a maximum age-predicted heart rate ≥85% in 509 consecutive patients who reached ≥10 METS. Events including all-cause and cardiac mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and late revascularization (>4 weeks after MPI) were prospectively collected.

Results: Of the 509 patients achieving ≥10 METS, follow-up for mortality was obtained in 463 (91%). Those lost to follow-up were older and had higher rates of tobacco use. The prevalences of CAD risk factors, prior known CAD, and MPI abnormalities were higher for the 68 patients failing to reach 85% of their target heart rate. The rate of ≥10% left-ventricular (LV) ischemia by MPI remained very low irrespective of attained heart rate (0.6% (3/463)). Six (1.2%) had an LVEF < 40%. Death occurred in 12 (2.6%) patients, one of which was classified as cardiac (0.1%/year). The other 11 deaths were related to cancer. Additionally, there were three nonfatal MIs (0.7 %) and one late revascularization (0.2%). Only one of these patients had any ischemia on MPI. No cardiac event patient had exercise ST depression or ≥5% LV ischemia.

Conclusions: Thus, patients at intermediate risk for CAD or known CAD achieving ≥10 METS have a very low prevalence of ≥10% LV ischemia and very low rates of cardiac mortality, nonfatal MI, and late revascularization, irrespective of heart rate achieved. Cardiac events did not correlate with abnormalities on the index MPI study. These results suggest that patients who attain ≥10 METS during exercise stress have an excellent prognosis over an intermediate term of follow-up, regardless of peak exercise heart rate achieved. The added value of MPI to standard exercise ECG testing in this population is questionable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have indicated that they have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram showing the derivation of the study cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival free of cardiac death or nonfatal MI. The percentage of the 463 subjects remaining free of cardiac death or nonfatal MI is displayed over 2.5 years of follow-up.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: Summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1531–40. - PubMed
    1. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/ AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2201–29. - PubMed
    1. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1318–33. - PubMed
    1. Balady GJ, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Leip EP, O’Donnell CJ, Levy D. Usefulness of exercise testing in the prediction of coronary disease risk among asymptomatic persons as a function of the Framingham risk score. Circulation. 2004;110:1920–5. - PubMed
    1. Morise AP, Jalisi F. Evaluation of pretest and exercise test scores to assess all-cause mortality in unselected patients presenting for exercise testing with symptoms of suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:842–50. - PubMed

Publication types