Oversimplifying evolutionary psychology leads to explanatory gaps
- PMID: 21133525
- DOI: 10.1037/a0021024
Oversimplifying evolutionary psychology leads to explanatory gaps
Abstract
Comments on Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations (see record 2010-02208-001) by Confer et al. They argued that SST cannot explain the existence of either homosexuality or suicide within the human species. We contend that a sufficiently nuanced evolutionary position has no difficulties explaining either phenomenon. Also in this account, it is assumed that all psychological functioning must serve survival and reproduction. However, since evolution selects against certain qualities (it does not select for qualities, as it is commonly, but incorrectly, described), two types of qualities should remain intact for any species: (a) those that facilitate survival and reproduction and (b) those that do not impede survival and reproduction at the population level.
PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Trade-offs, individual differences, and misunderstandings about evolutionary psychology.Am Psychol. 2010 Dec;65(9):930-2. doi: 10.1037/a0021635. Am Psychol. 2010. PMID: 21133526
Comment on
-
Evolutionary psychology. Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations.Am Psychol. 2010 Feb-Mar;65(2):110-26. doi: 10.1037/a0018413. Am Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20141266 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources