Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22026-31.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007887107. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation

Affiliations

A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation

Susanne C Moser et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

This article presents a systematic framework to identify barriers that may impede the process of adaptation to climate change. The framework targets the process of planned adaptation and focuses on potentially challenging but malleable barriers. Three key sets of components create the architecture for the framework. First, a staged depiction of an idealized, rational approach to adaptation decision-making makes up the process component. Second, a set of interconnected structural elements includes the actors, the larger context in which they function (e.g., governance), and the object on which they act (the system of concern that is exposed to climate change). At each of these stages, we ask (i) what could impede the adaptation process and (ii) how do the actors, context, and system of concern contribute to the barrier. To facilitate the identification of barriers, we provide a series of diagnostic questions. Third, the framework is completed by a simple matrix to help locate points of intervention to overcome a given barrier. It provides a systematic starting point for answering critical questions about how to support climate change adaptation at all levels of decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Scope and scale of adaptation to climate change [based on an extensive literature review (ref. , especially refs. –18)].
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Phases and subprocesses throughout the adaptation process.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The structural elements of the diagnostic framework: interacting actors, the governance and larger socio-economic context, and the system of concern that is to be managed for climate change.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Opportunities for influence and intervention to overcome barriers.

References

    1. Adger WN, et al. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp. 717–743.
    1. Smith JB, Vogel JM, Cromwell JE., III An architecture for government action on adaptation to climate change. An editorial comment. Clim Change. 2009;95:53–61.
    1. National Research Council . America's Climate Choices: Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Washington, DC: Natl Acad Press; 2010.
    1. Schipper ELF. Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law. 2006;15:82–92.
    1. O'Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO. Questioning complacency: Climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio. 2006;35:50–56. - PubMed

Publication types