Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):4-11.
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181fb0071.

A process evaluation of an active surveillance system for hospitalized 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza cases

Affiliations

A process evaluation of an active surveillance system for hospitalized 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza cases

Christine Barr et al. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: A process evaluation was conducted to evaluate a newly established active influenza surveillance program that utilized 6 sentinel hospitals to collect epidemiologic information for influenza-like illness admissions. Objectives were to determine whether the new system was implemented successfully and met surveillance objectives, including determination of the proportion of patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza, extent of disease severity, and identifying high-risk groups.

Methods: Timeliness and data quality were assessed through analysis of electronic case report form completion and timing of specimen collection and submission to public health laboratories for influenza testing. Simplicity and accessibility of the surveillance system were assessed through a survey of hospital-based surveillance staff.

Results: The median number of days from admission to initial reporting was 5 days. The completeness of core variables was more than 98%, 96.2% for complications, and 92.6% for underlying medical conditions. Among influenza-like illness admissions, 77.8% had a specimen submitted for confirmatory testing. Eighty-nine percent of survey respondents found guidance provided by New York State Department of Health to be helpful and case report forms easy to use.

Conclusions: This project was implemented within a context of limited time and resources. Certain aspects of planning, such as securing necessary staffing at some hospitals, could not be carried out prior to implementation. Resource limitations necessitated controls on the numbers of specimens submitted each week. Some reporting lags were noted because of delays in data entry. Reporting timeframes allowed for timely data summarization for internal decision making. Maintaining frequent contact with sentinel sites promoted report completeness, timeliness, and consistency across sites. These results highlight the value of sentinel surveillance methodology and challenges of rapidly deploying a new active surveillance system for an emergent disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • One more lesson from the pandemic.
    Jhung MA, Finelli L. Jhung MA, et al. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318209869e. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011. PMID: 21135654 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms