Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;4(8-9):715-25.
doi: 10.1002/prca.201000018.

Proteomic analysis of endoscopically (endoscopic pancreatic function test) collected gastroduodenal fluid using in-gel tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS

Affiliations

Proteomic analysis of endoscopically (endoscopic pancreatic function test) collected gastroduodenal fluid using in-gel tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS

Joao A Paulo et al. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Proteomic analysis of gastroduodenal fluid offers an alternative strategy to study diseases, such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. We use in-gel tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS (GeLC-MS/MS) to profile the proteome of gastroduodenal fluid collected during the endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT).

Experimental design: Gastroduodenal fluid specimens collected during ePFT from six patients with upper abdominal pain were subjected to proteomic analysis. We extracted proteins using three chemical precipitation reagents (acetone, ethanol, and trichloroacetic acid) and analyzed each sample by SDS-PAGE and GeLC-MS/MS for protein identification. Cellular origin and molecular function of the identified proteins were determined via gene ontology analysis.

Results: All three precipitation techniques successfully extracted protein from gastroduodenal fluid, with acetone resulting in excellent resolution and minimal protein degradation compared with the other methods. A total of 134 unique proteins were found in our GeLC-MS/MS analysis of ePFT-collected gastroduodenal fluid samples. Sixty-seven proteins were identified in at least two of the three samples. Gene ontology analysis classified these proteins mainly as being peptidases and localized extracellularly.

Conclusions and clinical relevance: ePFT, followed by acetone precipitation, and coupled with LC-MS/MS, can be used to safely collect gastroduodenal fluid from the upper gastrointestinal tract for MS-based proteomic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental workflow. Gastroduodenal fluid is collected from six individuals, particulates are pelleted. Samples from the six individuals are pooled and subsequently divided into 3 aliquots to be precipitated by three different chemical (acetone, ethanol, and TCA) precipitation techniques. Samples are analyzed by GeLC-MS/MS methodology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SDS-PAGE analysis on gastroduodenal fluid of each of the six individuals. Patient-to-patient variability is observed among the six samples. Subsequent proteomic analyses use a pooled sample of gastroduodenal fluid from these six individuals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protein extraction from gastroduodenal fluid. A) SDS-PAGE analysis of gastroduodenal fluid precipitated by (1) acetone, (2) ethanol, and (3) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). B) Quantitative gel densitometry measurements of gel lanes (98kDa to 7kDa molecular weight marker) as determined using ImageJ software. Data points were normalized with respect to the maximum intensity value.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Venn diagram depicting the number of proteins identified by GeLC-MS/MS of gel lanes in gastroduodenal fluid precipitated by acetone, ethanol, and TCA. Tallied proteins were identified with two or more peptides that were of 95% or greater confidence as determined by the Paragon Algorithm [19].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Gene ontology analysis of A) subcellular localization and B) molecular function. Gene ontology characterization using the categories listed of the proteins identified in 2 of the 3 samples was performed manually with the UniProt [21] database or using the GoFact online tool [22, 23].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thongboonkerd V. Proteomics of human body fluids : principles, methods, and applications. Humana Press; Totowa, N.J: 2007.
    1. Yates JR, Ruse CI, Nakorchevsky A. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:49–79. - PubMed
    1. Pan S, Aebersold R, Chen R, Rush J, et al. Mass spectrometry based targeted protein quantification: methods and applications. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:787–797. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Second TP, Blethrow JD, Schwartz JC, Merrihew GE, et al. Dual-pressure linear ion trap mass spectrometer improving the analysis of complex protein mixtures. Anal Chem. 2009;81:7757–7765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Issaq HJ, Xiao Z, Veenstra TD. Serum and plasma proteomics. Chemical reviews. 2007;107:3601–3620. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources