Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;41(2):109-14.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.32040.

Giant cell tumor of bone: Is curettage the answer?

Affiliations

Giant cell tumor of bone: Is curettage the answer?

Shishir Rastogi et al. Indian J Orthop. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Giant cell tumors (GCT) are neoplasms of mesenchymal stromal cells with varied manifestations. There is no uniform accepted treatment protocol for these tumors,

Materials and methods: 49 cases of proven giant cell tumors of appendicular skeleton, 27 prospective and 22 retrospective constituteed this study. The retrospective cases were collected by using computerized data base collection method. The patients were evaluated clinically, radiologically and by histology. Companacci grading and Enneking staging was used in the study. Two treatment modalities were used a) extended curettage (with/ without bone grafting/ cementation) or b) wide excision and reconstruction with a prosthesis or arthrodesis. Functional evaluation was done by Enneking's system. Chi square tests, mann-whitney test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The average age was 26.82 years (16-50 years). 25 patients (51%) were recurrent GCT at presentation. The commonest site was lower end of femur (16 cases, 32.65%) and upper end of tibia (13 cases, 26.53%). 40 (81.63%) tumors had less than 5 mm of subchondral bone free of tumor. 35 (71.43%) tumors were Enneking's surgical stage III and companacci grade III. Pathological fractures were seen in 12 (24.49%) cases. Intra-lesional currettage was used in 28 and enbloc excision in 19 patients and 2 (4.08%) underwent amputation. The average follow up period was 18.6 months (range 2-84). One recurrence was seen in a grade III recurrent distal radial lesion in the intralesional curettage group (3.57%) Enneking's functional score with intralesional curettage (25.41) was better than enbloc excision (21.37). Enbloc excision had higher rates of infections (36.84 % Vs 25%) and soft tissue coverage problems (21.05% Vs 0).

Conclusion: Intralesional therapy has a better functional outcome and less complications than enbloc excision, albeit with a high recurrence rate which can however be effectively treated with repeat extended curettage.

Keywords: Adjuvant therapy; extended curettage; giant cell tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A) X-rays (A.P.) of the knee in a 17-year-old male with GCT of the distal femur with pathological fracture of the lateral femoral condyle. B) MRI of the same patient showing the pathological fracture and articular cartilage free of tumor. C), D). 7 month post operative x-rays (A.P. and lateral) of the same patient treated with curettage, bone graft and bone cement
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) Pre-operative x-ray of recurrent GCT of distal end radius in a 35-year -old female. B) 8 month post-operative x-ray of the same patient. C), D) Clinical picture demonstrating good range of wrist movements in the same patient at 8 months follow up
Figure 3
Figure 3
A), B) X-rays (A.P.) and lateral) of knee shows a recurrent GCT distal end femur in a 25-year-old female. C) Postoperative x-ray of the same patient showing tumor excision and endoprosthesis insertion. D) Post operative picture of the same patient with coverage problems of the wound. E) 5 month post op picture of the same patient showing removal of prosthesis and cement spacer insertion. Patient underwent ampution after 13 months due to uncontrolled infection

References

    1. McDonald DJ, Sim FH, McLeod RA, Dahlin DC. Giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:235–42. - PubMed
    1. Malawer MM, Bickels J, Meller I, Buch RG, Henshaw RM, Kollender Y. Cryosurgery in the treatment of giant cell tumor. A long-term followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;359:176–88. - PubMed
    1. Duncan CP, Morton KS, Arthur JF. Giant cell tumor of bone: Its aggressiveness and potential for malignant change. Can J Surg. 1983;26:475–6. - PubMed
    1. Komiya S, Inoue A, Nakashima M, Ueno A, Fujikawa K, Ikuta H. Prognostic factors in giant cell tumor of bone. A modified histological grading system useful as a guide to prognosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1986;105:67–72. - PubMed
    1. Campanacci M, Baldini N, Boriani S, Sudanese A. Giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:106–14. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources