Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jun;25(6):1827-34.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1474-3. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

Electrocautery causes more ischemic peritoneal tissue damage than ultrasonic dissection

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Electrocautery causes more ischemic peritoneal tissue damage than ultrasonic dissection

Richard P G ten Broek et al. Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Minimizing peritoneal tissue injury during abdominal surgery has the benefit of reducing postoperative inflammatory response, pain, and adhesion formation. Ultrasonic dissection seems to reduce tissue damage. This study aimed to compare electrocautery and ultrasonic dissection in terms of peritoneal tissue ischemia measured by microdialysis.

Methods: In this study, 18 Wistar rats underwent a median laparotomy and had a peritoneal microdialysis catheter implanted in the left lateral sidewall. The animals were randomly assigned to receive two standard peritoneal incisions parallel to the catheter by either ultrasonic dissection or electrocautery. After the operation, samples of microdialysis dialysate were taken every 2 h until 72 h postoperatively for measurements of pyruvate, lactate, glucose, and glycerol, and ratios were calculated.

Results: The mean lactate-pyruvate ratio (LPR), lactate-glucose ratio (LGR), and glycerol concentration were significantly higher in the electrocautery group than in the ultrasonic dissection group until respectively 34, 48, and 48 h after surgery. The mean areas under the curve (AUC) of LPR, LGR, and glycerol concentration also were higher in the electrocautery group than in the ultrasonic dissection group (4,387 vs. 1,639, P=0.011; 59 vs. 21, P=0.008; 7,438 vs. 4,169, P=0.008, respectively).

Conclusion: Electrosurgery causes more ischemic peritoneal tissue damage than ultrasonic dissection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surgical procedure and microdialysis system. A Median laparotomy. B Two parallel incisions in the parietal peritoneum on both sides of the microdialysis catheter at a distance of 5 mm from the probe. The catheter is connected to a pump and automatic sampler
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Unrefined data. Microdialysis parameters in animals that had surgery with ultrasonic dissection (UD) (n = 9) or electrocautery (EC) (n = 9)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Microdialysis parameters in animals that had surgery with ultrasonic dissection (UD) (n = 9) or electrocautery (EC) (n = 9). Values are expressed as means and 95% confidence intervals. *P < 0.01

References

    1. van der Wal JB, Jeekel J. Biology of the peritoneum in normal omeostasis and after surgical trauma. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(Suppl 2):9–13. - PubMed
    1. Brazio PS, Laird PC, Xu C, Gu J, Burris NS, Brown EN, Kon ZN, Poston RS. Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery for harvest of radial artery conduits: reduced risk of spasm and intimal injury on optical coherence tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1302–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.05.060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erkut B, Unlu Y, Karapolat S, Ugur KC, Ceviz M, Becit N, Kocak H. Comparison of harmonic scalpel and high-frequency electrocautery in radial artery harvesting. J Cardiovasc Surg Torino. 2008;49:371–379. - PubMed
    1. Kim FJ, Chammas MF, Jr, Gewehr E, Morihisa M, Caldas F, Hayacibara E, Baptistussi M, Meyer F, Martins AC. Temperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: Harmonic ACE (ACE), Ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT) Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1464–1469. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9650-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muller M. Science, medicine, and the future: Microdialysis. BMJ. 2002;324:588–591. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.588. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources