Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec 13:18:66.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-66.

The performance and assessment of hospital trauma teams

Affiliations
Review

The performance and assessment of hospital trauma teams

Andrew Georgiou et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

The purpose of the trauma team is to provide advanced simultaneous care from relevant specialists to the seriously injured trauma patient. When functioning well, the outcome of the trauma team performance should be greater than the sum of its parts. Trauma teams have been shown to reduce the time taken for resuscitation, as well as time to CT scan, to emergency department discharge and to the operating room. These benefits are demonstrated by improved survival rates, particularly for the most severely injured patients, both within and outside of dedicated trauma centres. In order to ensure the best possible performance of the team, the leadership skills of the trauma team leader are essential and their non-technical skills have been shown to be particularly important. Team performance can be enhanced through a process of audit and assessment of the workings of the team and the evidence currently available suggests that this is best facilitated through the process of video review of the trauma resuscitation. The use of human patient simulators to train and assess trauma teams is becoming more commonplace and this technique offers a safe environment for the future education of trauma team staff. Trauma teams are a key component of most programmes which set out to improve trauma care. This article reviews the background of trauma teams, the evidence for benefit and potential techniques of performance assessment. The review was written after a PubMed, Ovid, Athens, Cochrane and guideline literature review of English language articles on trauma teams and their performance and hand searching of references from the relevant searched articles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The typical composition of a trauma team. (Adapted from http://www.trauma.org[12]).

References

    1. Baker SP, O'Neil B, Ginsburg MJ, Li G. The injury fact book. Oxford University Press, New York; 1992.
    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death. Trauma: who cares. 2007. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2007t.htm
    1. Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®) Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2004. http://www.facs.org/trauma/atls/information.html (accessed February 24th 2009)
    1. Royal College of Surgeons of England. Report of the working party on the management of patients with major injury. 1988. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs/publication.2005-09-01.7097315...
    1. The Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Orthopaedic Society. Better Care for the Severely Injured. 2000. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs/severely_injured.html

MeSH terms