Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;11(9):816-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.019. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

Walking assessment in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: capacity, performance, and self-report measures

Justin Conway  1 , Christy C Tomkins, Andrew J Haig
Affiliations

Walking assessment in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: capacity, performance, and self-report measures

Justin Conway et al. Spine J. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background context: Ambulation limitation is the hallmark of impairment in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Capacity and performance have been defined as two distinct aspects of disability. Previous literature suggests that a person's walking capacity may not be reflected in their daily walking performance.

Purpose: To examine the relationship between survey instruments, tested walking capacity, and daily ambulatory performance in people diagnosed with LSS.

Study design/setting: Prospective laboratory and clinical observational study at a tertiary care spine clinic.

Patient sample: Twelve subjects with LSS significant enough to be scheduled for epidural injection.

Outcome measures: Questionnaire (including the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey), laboratory walk testing (walking capacity), and activity monitors (community ambulation).

Methods: Subjects filled out functional questionnaires, performed a Self-Paced Walking Test (SPWT) of up to 30 minutes, and wore an Actigraph activity monitor during walking hours for 7 days.

Results: There was no statistically significant relationship between walking capacity (SPWT) and community ambulation per day (activity monitors), however, the maximum time of continuous activity during community ambulation had a strong relationship (r=0.63) with the SPWT. Fifteen self-report measures of ambulation were significantly correlated with the SPWT, activity monitor, or both. Of these, 13 (87%) were more highly correlated to the SPWT than the activity monitor. The SPWT had a strong relationship (r>0.60, p<.05) with global function scales but community ambulation did not.

Conclusions: Walking capacity and walking performance in LSS appear to be different constructs. Survey instruments appear to reflect capacity rather than performance. This dissociation between walking capacity and walking performance has implications for the clinical management and outcomes assessment of people with LSS.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081–1093. - PubMed
    1. Abbott RD, White LR, Ross GW, et al. Walking and dementia in physically capable elderly men. JAMA. 2004;292:1447–1453. - PubMed
    1. King AC, Oman RF, Brassington GS, et al. Moderate-intensity exercise and self-rated quality of sleep in older adults. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;277:32–37. - PubMed
    1. Brosse AL, Sheets ES, Lett HS, et al. Exercise and the treatment of clinical depression in adults: recent findings and future directions. Sports Med. 2002;32:741–760. - PubMed
    1. Chad DA. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurol.Clin. 2007;25:407–418. - PubMed