Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Risk of colorectal and endometrial cancers in EPCAM deletion-positive Lynch syndrome: a cohort study

Marlies J E Kempers et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 mismatch-repair genes and leads to a high risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. We previously showed that constitutional 3' end deletions of EPCAM can cause Lynch syndrome through epigenetic silencing of MSH2 in EPCAM-expressing tissues, resulting in tissue-specific MSH2 deficiency. We aim to establish the risk of cancer associated with such EPCAM deletions.

Methods: We obtained clinical data for 194 carriers of a 3' end EPCAM deletion from 41 families known to us at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands and compared cancer risk with data from a previously described cohort of 473 carriers from 91 families with mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or a combined EPCAM-MSH2 deletion.

Findings: 93 of the 194 EPCAM deletion carriers were diagnosed with colorectal cancer; three of the 92 women with EPCAM deletions were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Carriers of an EPCAM deletion had a 75% (95% CI 65-85) cumulative risk of colorectal cancer before the age of 70 years (mean age at diagnosis 43 years [SD 12]), which did not differ significantly from that of carriers of combined EPCAM-MSH2 deletion (69% [95% CI 47-91], p=0·8609) or mutations in MSH2 (77% [64-90], p=0·5892) or MLH1 (79% [68-90], p=0·5492), but was higher than noted for carriers of MSH6 mutation (50% [38-62], p<0·0001). By contrast, women with EPCAM deletions had a 12% [0-27] cumulative risk of endometrial cancer, which was lower than was that noted for carriers of a combined EPCAM-MSH2 deletion (55% [20-90], p<0·0001) or of a mutation in MSH2 (51% [33-69], p=0·0006) or MSH6 (34% [20-48], p=0·0309), but did not differ significantly from that noted for MLH1 (33% [15-51], p=0·1193) mutation carriers. This risk seems to be restricted to deletions that extend close to the MSH2 gene promoter. Of 194 carriers of an EPCAM deletion, three had duodenal cancer and four had pancreatic cancer.

Interpretation: EPCAM deletion carriers have a high risk of colorectal cancer; only those with deletions extending close to the MSH2 promoter have an increased risk of endometrial cancer. These results underscore the effect of mosaic MSH2 deficiency, leading to variable cancer risks, and could form the basis of an optimised protocol for the recognition and targeted prevention of cancer in EPCAM deletion carriers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cancer risk in EPCAM deletion carriers. Cumulative risk until the age of 70 of colorectal cancer (A) and endometrial cancer (B) in EPCAM (black lines), EPCAM-MSH2 (pink lines), MSH2 (red lines), MSH6 (green lines), and MLH1 (blue lines) mutation carriers. Indicated log-rank p-values are comparisons relative to EPCAM deletion carriers. The number of subjects in the table below the graphs indicate the number of mutation carriers, that are at risk for their first colorectal (A) or endometrial cancer (B) at the given age. Eight EPCAM deletion carriers were excluded from the Kaplan Meier curves because the exact age at colorectal cancer diagnosis (n=2) or at follow up (n=6) were unknown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cancer risk in EPCAM deletion carriers in relation to deletion breakpoint and size. (A) Schematic representation of the size of each EPCAM deletion (depicted by bars) and its position relative to the MSH2 CpG island (CGI) promoter. The deletions found in the endometrial cancer patients are depicted in black, the others are presented in grey. For each deletion the number of carriers as well as the number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or endometrial cancer (EC) are indicated on the left. ST: subtotal; T: total. The cumulative colorectal (B) and endometrial (C) cancer risk of subgroup 1 (grey lines), subgroup 2 (black lines) in comparison to those of MSH2 (red lines) and MSH2-EPCAM (bleu lines) mutation carriers. Indicated log-rank p-values are comparisons relative to MSH2 mutation carriers. The number of subjects in the table below the graphs indicate the number of mutation carriers, that are at risk for their first colorectal (B) or endometrial cancer (C) at the given age. Eight EPCAM deletion carriers were excluded from the Kaplan Meier curves because the exact age at colorectal cancer diagnosis (n=2) or at follow up (n=6) were unknown.

Comment in

References

    1. Lynch HT, Lynch PM, Lanspa SJ, Snyder CL, Lynch JF, Boland CR. Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clin Genet. 2009;76:1–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koornstra JJ, Mourits MJ, Sijmons RH, Leliveld AM, Hollema H, Kleibeuker JH. Management of extracolonic tumours in patients with Lynch syndrome. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:400–8. - PubMed
    1. Hendriks YM, Wagner A, Morreau H, Menko F, Stormorken A, Quehenberger F, et al. Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer due to MSH6 mutations: impact on counseling and surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:17–25. - PubMed
    1. Vasen HF, Moslein G, Alonso A, Bernstein I, Bertario L, Blanco I, et al. Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer) J Med Genet. 2007;44:353–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Post RS, Kiemeney LA, Ligtenberg MJ, Witjes JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Bodmer D, et al. Risk of urothelial bladder cancer in Lynch syndrome is increased, in particular among MSH2 mutation carriers. J.Med.Genet. 2010;47(7):464–470. Ref Type: Journal (Full) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types